Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Force\s+12\s+EF420\/240\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Force\s+12\s+EF420\/240\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Force 12 EF420/240 (score: 1): Author: nw4p@xtn.net (Richard Robinson); Date: Sun Jan 26 12:25:43 2003; Gentlemen, I have had a C3E up for about 4 years now and am very pleased, swr remains the same as it was when I put it up. The last couple of years, I have been on 20 and 40 and I am thinking of upgr; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00433.html (6,917 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Force 12 EF420/240 (score: 1): Author: dhb@attbi.com (Dave, AA6YQ); Date: Sun Jan 26 13:19:26 2003; I've had a 420/240 up for nearly 5 years, located ~15 miles west of Boston. Its a high-wind toldeant D model. Physically, the antenna has been perfect, surviving wind, ice, and snow that have brought; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00435.html (7,875 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Force 12 EF420/240 (score: 1): Author: wa0nzo@pop.ctctel.com (Leon Kirschemann); Date: Mon Jan 27 10:21:36 2003; Hi Richard. I have a C3E and a EF420/240D. The 420/240 is up about 60ft and the c3e is up about 50ft. Comparing on 20 meters, I find the 240 to be about 1/2 to 1 s unit stronger than the c3e on dx st; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00454.html (7,012 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Force 12 EF420/240 (score: 1): Author: andy.faber@berliner.com (Faber, Andy L.); Date: Tue Jan 28 11:48:03 2003; Richard, I have had a 420 and now have a 240/320, and they both worked great on 20, and had some directionality and probably gain on 40 (e.g., 280 DXCC on that band), so overall the 420/240 should be; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00488.html (6,906 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]