Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Force\s+12\s+Sigma\s+80\s+$and\s+alternatives$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Force\s+12\s+Sigma\s+80\s+$and\s+alternatives$\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Force 12 Sigma 80 (and alternatives) (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 18:53:09 -0600; I'm not sure I agree that a base loaded 35 ft 80M vertical with a good ground system "would work nearly the same as a full size antenna" as W8JI suggests. My friend KZ4V had an HF2V vertical which is; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-02/msg00344.html (10,084 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Force 12 Sigma 80 (and alternatives) (score: 1): Author: daslin@bayarea.net (David Aslin); Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 19:05:05 -0800; See my previous postings on the Force 12 EF180BV. This is a 37 foot high linear loaded vertical. I used a pair spaced 30 feet (one-eighth wavelength) to get top 5 80M single band finishes in CQWW and; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-02/msg00350.html (12,288 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]