Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Force12\s+rivets\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Force12\s+rivets\s*$/: 47 ]

Total 47 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [TowerTalk] Force12 rivets (score: 1): Author: Barry Gross <n1eu.barry@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 14:24:37 +0000; Sounds great - please share your expertise in lowering the AB-577 in very windy condx, solo. Yes, it's been very windy here. To address other comments, I assure you my C3S is riveted to spec, althoug; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00391.html (10,280 bytes)
42. Re: [TowerTalk] Force12 rivets (score: 1): Author: Ed Muns <w0yk@msn.com>; Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 11:37:05 -0800; Barry, N1EU, asked: N6BT always advised me to put three rivets at each location, 120 degrees apart around the element. On smaller diameters, only two may be possible and even they may have to be stag; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00413.html (9,735 bytes)
43. Re: [TowerTalk] Force12 rivets (score: 1): Author: "Gary E. Jones" <garyejones@cmaaccess.com>; Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 07:30:10 -0600; I have a bunch of Force 12 antennas up in the air, all without any problems for years. However, that is probably because a good friend of mine bought a bunch before me, and rather quickly had one of; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00431.html (12,130 bytes)
44. Re: [TowerTalk] Force12 rivets (score: 1): Author: K8RI on TT <k8ri-on-towertalk@tm.net>; Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 10:27:16 -0500; I "would think" that two or 3 sets at 120 degrees staggered with a 60 degree offset would give the most secure connection. BTW I mentioned way earlier in this thread that my force 12's didn't have bl; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00433.html (11,245 bytes)
45. Re: [TowerTalk] Force12 rivets (score: 1): Author: GEORGE BETHEA <k5jz@bellsouth.net>; Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 08:53:36 -0800 (PST); I sent my first post (reply) as a private reply... sorry... I thought I sent it to all. My apologies to K8RI for a double post to him. I lost my email so if K8RI would repost it to the list for me, I; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00436.html (11,715 bytes)
46. Re: [TowerTalk] Force12 rivets (score: 1): Author: Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net>; Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 10:12:40 -0800; One more implementation alternative to add to the stack: Place the rivets at 90 degrees to each other, two sets of two offset along the element at 1/2 the rivet spacing. The theory is the same as usi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00442.html (13,032 bytes)
47. Re: [TowerTalk] Force12 rivets (score: 1): Author: K8RI on TT <k8ri-on-towertalk@tm.net>; Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 15:45:26 -0500; Repost _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tow; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00443.html (13,730 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 47
Page: [1] [2] [3]