Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Fw\:\s+Multi\-band\s+dipoles\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Fw\:\s+Multi\-band\s+dipoles\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Fw: Multi-band dipoles (score: 1): Author: "Gene Fuller" <w2lu@rochester.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 14:23:16 -0400; _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-04/msg00386.html (8,796 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Fw: Multi-band dipoles (score: 1): Author: K8RI on TT <k8ri-on-towertalk@tm.net>; Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 16:05:25 -0400; Wellll...perhaps, but I've always found the gain for trap verticals to be on the negative side and performance to be sadly lacking where I could run comparisons with dipoles in an A/B arrangement. Mu; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-04/msg00389.html (11,650 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]