Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Fw\:\s+Why\s+radials\s+improve\s+radiation\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Fw\:\s+Why\s+radials\s+improve\s+radiation\!\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Fw: Why radials improve radiation! (score: 1): Author: "Al Williams" <alwilliams@olywa.net>; Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 08:55:56 -0700; Help, Help! There have been many, many postings on how to set up the radials but never a discussion on why or how radials actually effect the radials as it seems to be "beyond the scope....". It is p; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-05/msg00380.html (8,652 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Fw: Why radials improve radiation! (score: 1): Author: David Robbins <k1ttt@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 11:25:52 -0500 (CDT); <but never a discussion on why or how radials actually effect the not really beyond the scope, but often leading to long heated discussions. it does get a bit more complex than that, but thats enoug; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-05/msg00381.html (11,859 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Fw: Why radials improve radiation! (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 10:37:18 -0700; There are excellent discussions of this in the ARRL publications like The Antenna Book, the Handbook, and the ON4UN book. Al Christman (K3LC) and Rudy Severns (N6LF) have written really good stuff on; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-05/msg00383.html (8,970 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Fw: Why radials improve radiation! (score: 1): Author: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>; Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 14:15:24 -0400; You can calculate this the other way around. First, build an antenna (say 1/4 wave vertical) with an exceedingly good ground system (say 120 1/2 wave radials). Assume that system has near zero ground; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-05/msg00384.html (8,972 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] Fw: Why radials improve radiation! (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 07:55:52 -0700; One has to be careful when using terms like "reflection" because it sometimes is just a nice conceptual model for a much more complex behavior. For instance, if one is calculating the electric field; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-05/msg00404.html (11,282 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]