Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Fw\:\s+book\s+Tribander\s+comparison\s+test\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Fw\:\s+book\s+Tribander\s+comparison\s+test\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Fw: book Tribander comparison test (score: 1): Author: "Sam Andrews" <sandrews@aristotle.net>; Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 15:56:58 -0600; Jim, Tnx. Makes a lot of sense. Several pfs on each side of the choke at 30 mhz is a negligible amount. 73, Sam AE5L _______________________________________________ __________________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-03/msg00067.html (9,126 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Fw: book Tribander comparison test (score: 1): Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>; Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2011 23:06:29 +0000; Let's say there was 5pF from each side of the choke to the boom - that's 2.5pF net. At 30MHz that's a reactance of 2000 Ohms shunting the choke. Not sure if that makes a difference in your applicatio; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-03/msg00087.html (7,658 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Fw: book Tribander comparison test (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2011 01:04:57 -0800; My response on this was trimmed. What I said was that the capacitance via the boom is in parallel with the choke, WHICH IS A VERy LOW Q PARALLEL RESONANT CIRCUIT, so that the effect of the capacitanc; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-03/msg00097.html (8,601 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Fw: book Tribander comparison test (score: 1): Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>; Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2011 11:54:03 +0000; Jim, Just one correction: the length of boom in series with the capacitors represents an Inductive reactance provided it's less than a quarterwave long; that actually has the undesired effect of canc; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-03/msg00098.html (8,996 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]