Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Fw\:\s+elevated\s+radials\s+vertical\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Fw\:\s+elevated\s+radials\s+vertical\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Fw: elevated radials vertical (score: 1): Author: "EC1CT Fernando" <ec1cwg@dxhunters.com>; Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 08:04:29 +0200; Talking about these things. Yesterday, I was setting up my new top-loaded quarter wave vertical for 80 meters (see me at qrz.com). It´s made by EA5JK and the loading system is pretty similar t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00176.html (9,139 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Fw: elevated radials vertical (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2007 23:30:29 -0700; I'll bet that the vertical on the metal roof works just fine! Have you tried transmitting through it? Your mistake is thinking that SWR and impedance defines how well the antenna works. WRONG! A vert; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00177.html (8,408 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Fw: elevated radials vertical (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 06:47:34 -0400; up in the roof and attached directly to it. Using a MFJ analyzer we found out that the antenna tunned correctly buy we got a very low impedance (about 20 ohmns) so we assumed that the performance was; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00180.html (11,396 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Fw: elevated radials vertical (score: 1): Author: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 12:03:55 -0500; What did you do to the ground system that made the base impedance go up but yet increased the field strength? 73 Gary K4FMX _______________________________________________ __________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00191.html (8,172 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] Fw: elevated radials vertical (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 18:52:03 -0400; In the latest case we were testing elevated radials vs. buried radials with exactly the same radiator on 40 meters. We moved the radiator higher or lower to match the height of the radials so the ef; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00210.html (10,510 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]