Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Fwd\:\s+Fwd\:\s+New\s+FAA\s+regulations\s+affecting\s+towers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Fwd\:\s+Fwd\:\s+New\s+FAA\s+regulations\s+affecting\s+towers\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Fwd: Fwd: New FAA regulations affecting towers (score: 1): Author: Hans Hammarquist via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 00:14:14 -0400; Beats me what this is solving. I think it has to do with a couple of dust plane pilots that were killed by flying in to some temporary weather towers. I pray that ARRL get some say in the actual regu; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-07/msg00384.html (15,639 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Fwd: New FAA regulations affecting towers (score: 1): Author: Larry Loen <lwloen@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2016 22:24:22 -0700; Another interesting consideration is that a lot of this out of town property is likely to be _zoned_ agricultural. An interesting distinction for regulators and lawyers to consider. A lot of farm lan; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-07/msg00385.html (19,177 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Fwd: New FAA regulations affecting towers (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI) on TT" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 03:49:09 -0400; 1st, this "legislation" was brought about by lobbying after the aforementioned collisions with meteorological towers. The tower heights were presented in the light that the companies using the towers; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-07/msg00386.html (13,564 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]