Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Fwd\:\s+Fwd\:\s+OT\:\s+Satellite\s+Internet\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Fwd: Fwd: OT: Satellite Internet (score: 1)
Author: hanslg@aol.com
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 14:27:56 -0400
Sorry for the mistake. It appears that water absorption is not tha easy matter as a peak somewhere. Check http://www1.lsbu.ac.uk/water/microwave.html for some more details. The "peak" appears to be v
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00561.html (10,781 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] Fwd: Fwd: OT: Satellite Internet (score: 1)
Author: hanslg@aol.com
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 15:40:29 -0400
How easy would it be to arrange an I-connection on UHF? We did relatively good linking all our digipeaters together and go one step further should be possible especially with all the towers we have u
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00564.html (12,270 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Fwd: OT: Satellite Internet (score: 1)
Author: Adam Shirley WJ4X <wj4x@amsat.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 15:45:07 -0400
Your amateur radio license allows you to use "out of band" wireless networking.. You can move out of the standard channels for wireless networking and use some power and do a lot with IP over RF. htt
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00565.html (13,197 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Fwd: OT: Satellite Internet (score: 1)
Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 13:08:09 -0700
oh wow.. this opens a whole can of worms.. First, the OTARD rules contain provisions for wireless internet, essentially pre-empting any HOA, City, County, etc rules for such things as MMDS and Wirele
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00569.html (12,768 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Fwd: OT: Satellite Internet (score: 1)
Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 13:11:27 -0700
BTW you could do this perfectly legally without using ham radio.. put 24dBi antennas at both ends, and 10 miles is no problem with standard off the shelf 802.11 gear. that 40-50 dB extra gain is like
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00570.html (11,244 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Fwd: OT: Satellite Internet (score: 1)
Author: Ryan Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 16:17:00 -0400
The only catch would be that there could not be any commercial traffic, which rules out using your ham license for a high powered wifi backhaul for internet access. It won't be legal. Ryan, N2RJ -- R
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00572.html (12,090 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Fwd: OT: Satellite Internet (score: 1)
Author: Adam Shirley WJ4X <wj4x@amsat.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 16:23:36 -0400
If it's for your own personal use, and you're not making money off it, what makes it illegal? At this point I'm curious, as it's something I've been interested in doing, but never really went past Go
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00573.html (12,230 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Fwd: OT: Satellite Internet (score: 1)
Author: Ryan Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 16:37:33 -0400
A couple of issues would arise. Firstly, most websites contain advertising. Some websites that contain advertising contain inappropriate material for amateur radio use. I remember a case years ago wh
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00574.html (13,845 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Fwd: OT: Satellite Internet (score: 1)
Author: "Richard M. Gillingham" <rmoodyg@bellsouth.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 17:24:38 -0400
Ever purchase anything through Amazon? Ham gear through HRO, AES? online? That makes the use of amateur frequencies verboten.. That plus paying all your bills etc etc etc... Now if all you do is read
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00577.html (13,484 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Fwd: OT: Satellite Internet (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 15:26:16 -0700
I don't understand these comments. Forget the ham radio part ... if I understand him correctly he's saying that someone (anyone) could add a couple of 24 dbi antennas to a standard 802.11 system and
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00579.html (13,137 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Fwd: OT: Satellite Internet (score: 1)
Author: "Bruce Jungwirth" <k0son@frontiernet.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 17:44:45 -0500
Correct me if I'm wrong, but per FCC 47CFR part 15, in order to receive a FCC Grant (FCC ID)for an intentional radiator, which an 802.11 system would be, the system is approved with a specific antenn
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00582.html (14,215 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Fwd: OT: Satellite Internet (score: 1)
Author: "Larry WA9VRH" <wa9vrh@dishmail.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 17:50:13 -0500
Well all I am surprised that the list admin has not shut this down... I for one have had great success with Wild Blue. MAYBE what you need to do is actually talk to your neighbors and see what they u
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00584.html (14,378 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Fwd: OT: Satellite Internet (score: 1)
Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 16:32:07 -0700
I think there's two parallel sort of threads here.. The "use ham radio to run high power" (which has all the problems discussed) or the "use antenna gain to run a point to point link" (which is prett
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00585.html (11,219 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Fwd: OT: Satellite Internet (score: 1)
Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 16:35:11 -0700
There are systems specifically designed to have interchangeable antennas. Basically, the transceiver is designed so that it is legal with *any* antenna hooked up (a matter of frequencies, modulation
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00586.html (11,180 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Fwd: OT: Satellite Internet (score: 1)
Author: Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 17:01:00 -0700
My long haul 802.11 ISP radio tech tells me that the regs are ERP based, so power output plus antenna gain can't exceed a spec (he is a Ham). Just like most broadcast licenses. Not likely this is eas
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00587.html (10,761 bytes)

16. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Fwd: OT: Satellite Internet (score: 1)
Author: Scott Reed <sreed@nwwnet.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 08:17:44 -0400
Other than many companies do not allow reselling or more than one location served from a demarc. Have the person with DSL check their contract first. -- Scott Reed Owner NewWays Networking, LLC Wirel
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00593.html (13,766 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu