Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Fwd\:\s+Fwd\:\s+Stacking\s+question\s+\-\s+another\s+reality\s+data\s+point\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Fwd\:\s+Fwd\:\s+Stacking\s+question\s+\-\s+another\s+reality\s+data\s+point\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Fwd: Fwd: Stacking question - another reality data point (score: 1): Author: Hans Hammarquist via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 11:46:17 -0400; I realize that the idea probably has been discussed before. I don't have the possibility to test it (yet) but was wondering if it would enhance the communication better than elevating a single beam a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-08/msg00177.html (14,969 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Fwd: Fwd: Stacking question - another reality data point (score: 1): Author: Hans Hammarquist via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 11:48:34 -0400; And how did it work? I think it could add to the understanding of propagation somewhat if we know from where the reflexes come from. Hans - N2JFS It's been done. The 20m 4-stack at KC1XX can be switc; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-08/msg00179.html (10,706 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]