Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Gain\s+Is\s+a\s+Function\s+of\s+Boom\s+Length\s+\-\s+True\s+and\s+Not\s+True\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Gain Is a Function of Boom Length - True and Not True (score: 1)
Author: "Ward Silver" <hwardsil@centurytel.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 09:19:29 -0700
It is true that in the absence of other factors, maximum gain is a function of boom length. However, in a multi-band antenna, secondary factors strongly affect how much gain can actually be realized
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00296.html (8,793 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Gain Is a Function of Boom Length - True and Not True (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Wilcox" <jim.wil@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 12:50:44 -0400
See--someone COULD effectively rebut the original post in a non-attacking and civil way. Oh, if only we all (including me) could/would do this. Thanks, Ward. 73 to all-- Jim, W3WV ___________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00297.html (8,697 bytes)

3. RE: [TowerTalk] Gain Is a Function of Boom Length - True and Not True (score: 1)
Author: "Bryan Rambo" <bryanr@bometals.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 17:10:39 -0400
I believe N0AX's statement to be true. Thanks Ward! A corollary: No amount of clever engineering in areas of element interaction, feed efficiency, tuning networks (i.e. - traps), impedance matching g
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00302.html (9,637 bytes)

4. RE: [TowerTalk] Gain Is a Function of Boom Length - True and Not True (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 17:19:36 -0700
At 05:10 PM 9/10/2003 -0400, Bryan Rambo wrote: I believe N0AX's statement to be true. Thanks Ward! A corollary: No amount of clever engineering in areas of element interaction, feed efficiency, tuni
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00305.html (9,303 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu