Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Gain\s+vs\.\s+VSWR\s+vs\.\s+Feedline\s+Loss\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Gain\s+vs\.\s+VSWR\s+vs\.\s+Feedline\s+Loss\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Gain vs. VSWR vs. Feedline Loss (score: 1): Author: hwardsil@WOLFENET.com (Ward Silver); Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1998 12:22:31 -0700 (PDT); Gain is not VSWR is not Feedline Loss. They are three completely separate issues. Doug's point is taken from the overall *system* point of view whereby net effectiveness is reduced by high VSWR. Poss; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00634.html (10,220 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Gain vs. VSWR vs. Feedline Loss (score: 1): Author: davidc@bit-net.com (DavidC); Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1998 15:37:03 -0400; separate I'd like to try to simplify this for a non-engineer type such as I. 1. If there is feedline loss then less signal gets from the TX output to the antenna (and thus to the listener -- you). 2; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00636.html (8,019 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Gain vs. VSWR vs. Feedline Loss (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (w8ji.tom); Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1998 21:55:50 -0400; Clear except here.... SWR has nothing to do with line radiation. Line radiation is only caused by imperfect current balance on the line, no matter what type line. 73 Tom -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.con; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00655.html (7,221 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]