Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Galvenized\s+Monopole\s+Foundation\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Galvenized Monopole Foundation (score: 1)
Author: Jonathan - KE0YBL via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2020 22:41:10 +0000
Hello Esteemed Cloud Climbers :) I may be acquiring a self-supporting ~85ft (after assembled) galvanized steel monopole. Its diameter is graduated from a ~5ft base to 2ft on top (3 sections). I'm pla
/archives//html/Towertalk/2020-08/msg00014.html (8,103 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Galvenized Monopole Foundation (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 19:42:03 -0400
Be aware that you'll also have to figure out a way to attach a rotator and mast to the pole for your beams. Most likely you'll have to fabricate everything yourself. Perhaps a giant ring rotator coul
/archives//html/Towertalk/2020-08/msg00015.html (8,033 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Galvenized Monopole Foundation (score: 1)
Author: Jonathan - KE0YBL via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2020 00:06:34 +0000
Yep, planning on a small crane. Not sure this type of flange is ideal for a buried pier footing. I've not found specific details on those beyond conceptual, though. Also planning to fabricate a cross
/archives//html/Towertalk/2020-08/msg00016.html (10,118 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Galvenized Monopole Foundation (score: 1)
Author: Mac <libbysales@austin.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 20:45:57 -0500
these sound as typical of Hwy lighting tower as well, but this is a dream tower for the right person, it wont be cheep to fab up a fixed schism to hold a rotor and mast but at the same time not prohi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2020-08/msg00017.html (12,039 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Galvenized Monopole Foundation (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <lists@oakcom.org>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 21:49:22 -0400
I would plan on mounting the rotator and mast outside of the pole, rather than inside. I'd install a couple of "ring collars" - off the shelf weldments used in the cell business - one at the pole top
/archives//html/Towertalk/2020-08/msg00018.html (8,830 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Galvenized Monopole Foundation (score: 1)
Author: Mac <libbysales@austin.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 21:15:10 -0500
Rethinking what Steve has just posted, yah you bet some outside rings and mast/rotor centering is solved big time in a very positive way solid way.  I'm all in now  mm I'd install a couple of "ring c
/archives//html/Towertalk/2020-08/msg00019.html (10,848 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Galvenized Monopole Foundation (score: 1)
Author: Jonathan - KE0YBL via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2020 02:13:33 +0000
Good thoughts, I had considered a similar approach, and that may really be the way to go. Any thoughts on foundation design? Or cost thoughts on a reasonable PE if that's needed? I'm committed to giv
/archives//html/Towertalk/2020-08/msg00020.html (11,353 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Galvenized Monopole Foundation (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <lists@oakcom.org>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 22:10:58 -0400
BTW on one of the other collar faces you could clamp a heavy duty gin pole to make life easy. -Steve K8LX I would plan on mounting the rotator and mast outside of the pole, rather than inside. I'd in
/archives//html/Towertalk/2020-08/msg00021.html (10,197 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Galvenized Monopole Foundation (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <lists@oakcom.org>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 22:35:53 -0400
The three common pole foundations are deep caisson, pad & pier, and big block, in that order. To get it engineered you would need a geo survey ($1500-$2500), which the manufacturer would use to *sugg
/archives//html/Towertalk/2020-08/msg00022.html (9,916 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Galvenized Monopole Foundation (score: 1)
Author: Jonathan - KE0YBL via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2020 02:46:16 +0000
Thanks, that's good info. Are there rules of thumb on coming up with the overkill mop design? I can make some assumptions based on height and surface, but I've not seen a standard formula or calculat
/archives//html/Towertalk/2020-08/msg00023.html (11,206 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Galvenized Monopole Foundation (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff DePolo" <jd0@broadsci.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 07:24:56 -0400
the cell 4" or Along the save lines as what Steve said, you could even side-mount a short section of 25G near the top and then be able to use an off-the-shelf rotor plate, thrust bearing, etc.. We d
/archives//html/Towertalk/2020-08/msg00024.html (9,321 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Galvenized Monopole Foundation (score: 1)
Author: john@kk9a.com
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2020 07:49:22 -0500
How difficult are monopoles to climb and work on antennas while on them? Every time that I see a crew on them they are hanging from a crane. John KK9A I would plan on mounting the rotator and mast ou
/archives//html/Towertalk/2020-08/msg00025.html (8,781 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] Galvenized Monopole Foundation (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <lists@oakcom.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 10:07:24 -0400
Good idea. I might use a piece of R45. I used to occasionally see an R25 pointy top section attached to the top of wooden utility poles. Same idea. -Steve K8LX Along the save lines as what Steve said
/archives//html/Towertalk/2020-08/msg00026.html (9,646 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] Galvenized Monopole Foundation (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <lists@oakcom.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 10:01:07 -0400
They typically have climbing pegs and a safety climb cable. For installing top mounted collars and platforms a crane is normally used. Once the platform is there, other work can be accomplished with
/archives//html/Towertalk/2020-08/msg00027.html (9,919 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] Galvenized Monopole Foundation (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 13:34:37 -0700
I used to occasionally see an R25 pointy top section attached to the top of wooden utility poles. Same idea. -Steve K8LX One of the local hams here had a big (~100+ ft) tree "topped" and had a tower
/archives//html/Towertalk/2020-08/msg00035.html (9,639 bytes)

16. Re: [TowerTalk] Galvenized Monopole Foundation (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 14:01:06 -0700
On 8/5/2020 1:34 PM, Richard (Rick) Karlquist wrote: One of the local hams here had a big (~100+ ft) tree "topped" and had a tower section installed as you described, so he could put up a rotatable Y
/archives//html/Towertalk/2020-08/msg00036.html (10,015 bytes)

17. Re: [TowerTalk] Galvenized Monopole Foundation (score: 1)
Author: John Simmons <jasimmons@pinewooddata.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 19:24:15 -0500
Very interesting post. I worked for a two-way shop for 27 years. When we were in search of a local tower guy for subcontracting I found a tree climber. The tree guy said that he had climbed dozens of
/archives//html/Towertalk/2020-08/msg00038.html (10,904 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu