Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Ginpole\s+for\s+20\s+foot\s+sections\s*$/: 60 ]

Total 60 documents matching your query.

41. [TowerTalk] Ginpole for 20 foot sections (score: 1)
Author: Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com (Michael Tope)
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 12:01:18 -0700
Hi all, The gin pole feels a downward force equal to twice the attached load. Thus the person pulling the rope has a 2:1 advantage in terms of his or her ability to push the tower down into the groun
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00313.html (13,686 bytes)

42. [TowerTalk] Ginpole for 20 foot sections (score: 1)
Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 15:06:11 -0400
To: <towertalk@contesting.com> If you put a tension guage on the tie off line, you would find that the tension is essentially equal to the load divided by whatever advantage exists in the tackle sys
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00314.html (10,703 bytes)

43. [TowerTalk] Ginpole for 20 foot sections (score: 1)
Author: ag0n@arrl.net (Gary McDuffie, Sr.)
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 13:10:29 -0600
The down force is subtracted from the weight of the tree and still applied as down force to hold the load. The down force of the tree to the ground decreases by the same amount that is transferred to
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00315.html (10,364 bytes)

44. [TowerTalk] Ginpole for 20 foot sections (score: 1)
Author: w7ni@easystreet.com (Stan or Patricia Griffiths)
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 11:58:01 -0700
Well, if I wanted a 2:1 mechanical advantage on my gin pole and the reduction in gin pole load it provides, this is EXACTLY how I would configure my gin pole. Stan w7ni@easystreet.com List Sponsor: A
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00316.html (10,364 bytes)

45. [TowerTalk] Ginpole for 20 foot sections (score: 1)
Author: k1ttt@berkshire.net (David Robbins)
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 19:20:03 +0100
its the same as if someone was holding it, you still have that downward force exerted to keep the load where it was. one basic misconception is that a force being applied doesn't mean that anything i
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00317.html (12,904 bytes)

46. [TowerTalk] Ginpole for 20 foot sections (score: 1)
Author: alsopb@gloryroad.net (alsopb)
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 19:58:55 +0000
Guys, There is a very simple way to figure the mechanical advantage without any understanding for forces et al. With the rope/pully arrangement in place: 1) Move the rope you pull on, say 5 feet. 2)
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00320.html (12,762 bytes)

47. [TowerTalk] Ginpole for 20 foot sections (score: 1)
Author: JBaumgarte@aol.com (JBaumgarte@aol.com)
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 16:02:28 EDT
<< You sure? Isn't a hundred-pound load going to weigh 100 pounds no matter how the block and tackle are set up? The load effort on the end of the rope will be reduced but the dead weight of the load
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00321.html (10,853 bytes)

48. [TowerTalk] Ginpole for 20 foot sections (score: 1)
Author: k1ttt@berkshire.net (David Robbins)
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 20:19:03 +0100
WRONG! the higher the mechanical advantage of the block and tackle the lower the load on what is holding it up(diregarding the weight of the tackle itself). i'm sorry if you just don't get it, i've e
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00322.html (11,081 bytes)

49. [TowerTalk] Ginpole for 20 foot sections (score: 1)
Author: n3ue@arrl.net (Ed Wolf)
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 16:27:09 -0400
My turn... Let me see if I now, after the past few days, understand. If I use a block and tackle with a 5:1 mechanical advantage attached to a beam in my garage to lift a 500 pound load, the 500 poun
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00323.html (11,767 bytes)

50. [TowerTalk] Ginpole for 20 foot sections (score: 1)
Author: nielsen@oz.net (Bob Nielsen)
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 13:31:13 -0700
Thanks for remembering that classic, Ward. I have a copy of it around somewhere, but won't show it to my XYL until AFTER I get a tower and antenna installed! If we start including friction, then we a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00324.html (10,576 bytes)

51. [TowerTalk] Ginpole for 20 foot sections (score: 1)
Author: kb0pyo@rconnect.com (Mark Brown)
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 15:34:12 -0500
when lifting a dead load with a single pulley you would have the 500lbs of weight plus 500 pounds of downforce for a total of 1000 lbs. With a 5:1 advantage you now have 500 lbs of dead weight plus 1
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00325.html (13,415 bytes)

52. [TowerTalk] Ginpole for 20 foot sections (score: 1)
Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG)
Date: 13 Jun 2001 13:38:34 -0700
Nope. It "weighs" only 100# at your end (the end you pull on). The beam still has to support the entire weight of the load, plus the pull force. 73 Mike N2MG _________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00326.html (9,678 bytes)

53. [TowerTalk] Ginpole for 20 foot sections (score: 1)
Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com)
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 15:18:58 -0600
I agree with this scenario which is an example of my statement that the mechanical advantage equals the number of segments between the support and the load. A gin pole for heavy loads can be configur
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00327.html (12,638 bytes)

54. [TowerTalk] Ginpole for 20 foot sections (score: 1)
Author: k6ll@juno.com (Dave Hachadorian)
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 16:11:12 +0000
As nicely stated by N2MG, the gin pole "has to support the entire weight of the load, plus the pull force." For a standard gin pole, with only one pulley at the top, lifting a 300 pound load, the gin
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00331.html (9,074 bytes)

55. [TowerTalk] Ginpole for 20 foot sections (score: 1)
Author: w7ni@easystreet.com (Stan or Patricia Griffiths)
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 12:37:34 -0700
Well, Tom . . . you are STILL a nonbeliever and you STILL have not tried the experiment and you STILL have not made the measurements, obviously. And you are STILL very WRONG about this concept. Its O
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00335.html (14,328 bytes)

56. [TowerTalk] Ginpole for 20 foot sections (score: 1)
Author: Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com (Michael Tope)
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 05:13:54 -0700
Same thing, Jim. Imagine that the tower is sitting in soft ground and starts to sink under the load suspended from the gin pole. With the configuration you describe (pull rope tied to a tree), the lo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00344.html (16,811 bytes)

57. [TowerTalk] Ginpole for 20 foot sections (score: 1)
Author: K7NV@contesting.com (Kurt Andress)
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 13:00:24 -0700
Hi Tom and all, Remember, when evaluating the true effect of the "reduced load" on the ginpole, that if the load is not directly below the pole, but creates a small angle between the line and the po
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00355.html (9,875 bytes)

58. [TowerTalk] Ginpole for 20 foot sections (score: 1)
Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com)
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 18:17:39 -0600
Ron, Your point is valid ONLY if the block and tackle is between the support and the load. If the block and tackle is between the puller and the gin pole rope, the tension in the puller's rope is red
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00364.html (15,925 bytes)

59. [TowerTalk] Ginpole for 20 foot sections (score: 1)
Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG)
Date: 14 Jun 2001 20:07:02 -0700
I don't recall reading anything in which the author advocated arranging the mechanical advantage between the worker and the ginpole. I don't see why anyone would *want* to set it up this way - the wo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00371.html (9,251 bytes)

60. [TowerTalk] Ginpole for 20 foot sections (score: 1)
Author: kb7ww@uswest.net (KB7WW Art Moe)
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 20:23:48 -0700
Where is the advantage for the gin pole??????? If the section weighs a hundred pounds, I don't care how many pulleys you use there is still a hundred pounds on the gin pole.......... It will take les
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00372.html (9,488 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu