Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Gizmotchy\'s\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Gizmotchy\'s\s*$/: 37 ]

Total 37 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Gizmotchy's (score: 1): Author: "NE6V" <NE6V@roadrunner.com>; Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 07:44:53 -0700; Hi Group, Many have asked what's a Gizmotchy, so I thought I'd provide the url. So everyone can see for themselves. -At the present I have (6) 2 mtr models, 4 elements each, 1500 watt gama matches. F; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00247.html (7,140 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Gizmotchy's (score: 1): Author: Michael Goins <wmgoins@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 10:04:26 -0500; Am I the only one here who feels that making 1KW and 5KW antennas primarily for CBers to use illegally is not okay? And before anyone says they can be used at legal power, why then the need for 5 KW; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00248.html (9,821 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Gizmotchy's (score: 1): Author: "Sain'T Tom" <dxhawg@windstream.net>; Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 08:13:39 -0800; Is there any advantage in using the Gizmotchy configuration? _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contestin; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00249.html (10,762 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Gizmotchy's (score: 1): Author: "Larry Banks" <larryb.w1dyj@verizon.net>; Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 11:18:05 -0400; Hi Mike -- totally agree. I wonder if anyone has modeled one of these things? If it's really both horizontally and vertically polarized (not circular) then it has to be poorer that a similar number o; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00250.html (11,136 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] Gizmotchy's (score: 1): Author: "WA6RKN" <WA6RKN@ARRL.net>; Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 08:37:50 -0700; Hmmmmmm.......I wish I had a buck for every THX6 sitting atop a 50 foot tower, connected to an illegally operated (And powered) radio on 11 meters. Or.... The number of hams who openly boast about ru; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00251.html (9,108 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] Gizmotchy's (score: 1): Author: Michael Goins <wmgoins@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 10:48:31 -0500; Quite likely true, but then the TH antenna series wasn't designed for illegal CB operation either, and this one is. The power rating and user feedback state that clearly. The TH is a ham band antenna; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00252.html (10,779 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] Gizmotchy's (score: 1): Author: Dan Zimmerman N3OX <n3ox@n3ox.net>; Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 11:52:14 -0400; Anything that's not elliptically/circularly polarized is just linearly polarized, and the "ratio" of vertical to horizontal response just depends on the tilt of the elements with respect to horizont; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00253.html (8,638 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] Gizmotchy's (score: 1): Author: "Michael Ryan" <mryan001@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 11:55:17 -0400; Illegal operation is just that...illegal. Be it on the ham bands or OTHER. The number of illegal (mobile style) amplifier builders out there may be down as there are more do it yourselfers so to spea; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00254.html (10,245 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] Gizmotchy's (score: 1): Author: Andre Van Wyk KR5DX <kr5dx@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 11:13:47 -0600; Mike, I agree with you in principle, BUT there are so many double standards out there, that this could open up a new can of worms. What about the amplifier manufacturer's making HF amps with a 30m ba; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00255.html (12,686 bytes)
10. Re: [TowerTalk] Gizmotchy's (score: 1): Author: "WA6RKN" <WA6RKN@ARRL.net>; Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 09:16:19 -0700; For some silly reason, it is an tenna of choice for CB'ers. Don't ask me why! I believe someone made comment about the need for 5kw gamma on the antenna and the 6 meter antenna came to mind, coupled; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00256.html (9,982 bytes)
11. Re: [TowerTalk] Gizmotchy's (score: 1): Author: "Larry Banks" <larryb.w1dyj@verizon.net>; Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 12:19:08 -0400; Hi Dan, You said this far better that I did! Thanks for the better explanation. For the record, I used a 2M yagi at 45° for a few years to "optimize" (compromise?) both SSB and FM. Worked. Turned out; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00257.html (11,159 bytes)
12. Re: [TowerTalk] Gizmotchy's (score: 1): Author: Michael Goins <wmgoins@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 11:22:23 -0500; Andre, But that is exactly the point. Illegal is illegal and the fact that others - hams or manufacturers - are also doing that which is illegal does not make it okay. We are supposed to be self-poli; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00258.html (13,645 bytes)
13. Re: [TowerTalk] Gizmotchy's (score: 1): Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 10:35:40 -0600; 30m has a 200 watt limit not 100 but I am sure many use far more than that. CC Packet Cluster W0MU-1 W0MU.NET or 67.40.148.194 "A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you m; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00260.html (13,237 bytes)
14. Re: [TowerTalk] Gizmotchy's (score: 1): Author: "Robert" <rgshauger@myyellowstone.net>; Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 09:39:33 -0700; Again...has anyone modeled one of these things? To me it looks to be variant of a vertically polarized yagi. Bob W7KD _______________________________________________ _________________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00262.html (13,806 bytes)
15. Re: [TowerTalk] Gizmotchy's (score: 1): Author: Bob Nielsen <n7xy@clearwire.net>; Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 09:42:20 -0700; That's in the US. Some other countries have higher limits. Bob, N7XY _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@c; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00263.html (14,840 bytes)
16. Re: [TowerTalk] Gizmotchy's (score: 1): Author: Forrest Wolf <forrestw@gbis.com>; Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 09:42:53 -0700; I operated one of these & learned polarization shift on DX signals. While on "horizontal" polarization, you'd see a dip in signal strength. If you switched to "vertical" polarization at the null, the; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00264.html (11,531 bytes)
17. Re: [TowerTalk] Gizmotchy's (score: 1): Author: RICHARD SOLOMON <w1ksz@q.com>; Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 16:44:25 +0000; For about 2/3 the price of that bird killer you can get a real 5 element 6 Meter Beam from Directive Systems, 73, Dick, W1KSZ _______________________________________________ _________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00265.html (14,995 bytes)
18. Re: [TowerTalk] Gizmotchy's (score: 1): Author: n8de@thepoint.net; Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 12:52:11 -0400; That limit is NOT worldwide. Don N8DE _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.cont; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00266.html (14,353 bytes)
19. Re: [TowerTalk] Gizmotchy's (score: 1): Author: Ryan Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 12:53:31 -0400; I run only 200 watts on 30m. My amp can only do 600 watts CW anyway. In fact most times I run 100 watts because the input slug of the amp is not really tuned for 30 (or 17, or 12). But I do crack pil; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00267.html (9,181 bytes)
20. Re: [TowerTalk] Gizmotchy's (score: 1): Author: "Sain'T Tom" <dxhawg@windstream.net>; Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 09:59:34 -0800; Do you think a ham could be more competitive in a pile up during one of those vertically polarized peaks by switching in a vertically polarized gain antenna? _________________________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00269.html (12,980 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]