Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Gizmotchy\'s\s*$/: 37 ]

Total 37 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TowerTalk] Gizmotchy's (score: 1)
Author: "NE6V" <NE6V@roadrunner.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 10:30:48 -0700
First off Mr.Goins, I do not make the antennas I only sell Amateur Radio Antennas. I'm sure when you went to the web site you saw very clearly my name is listed ONLY as a AMATEUR ANTENNA Distributor,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00270.html (13,184 bytes)

22. Re: [TowerTalk] Gizmotchy's (score: 1)
Author: "N2TK" <tony.kaz@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 13:44:38 -0400
Hey, hey, hey. Only use 100W to 3-el (MonstIR) at 82'. 335 confirmed on 30M. Well, used to use 150W when I had a TS950SDX. Now use 100W with a K3. 30M is a fun band. 73, N2TK, Tony --Original Message
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00271.html (13,861 bytes)

23. Re: [TowerTalk] Gizmotchy's (score: 1)
Author: "Sain'T Tom" <dxhawg@windstream.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 14:02:12 -0400
What if the signals between you and the rare DX became vertically polarized? Would you then have an advantage in the pile up if you could switch to a vertically polarized gain antenna? As I understan
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00272.html (14,534 bytes)

24. Re: [TowerTalk] Gizmotchy's (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Ryan" <mryan001@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 14:05:26 -0400
I remember reading a study back some years ago about the benefits or lack there of, in using a vertically polarized antenna as oposed to a horizontally polarized antenna for long distance work. It re
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00273.html (13,313 bytes)

25. Re: [TowerTalk] Gizmotchy's (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Katz" <stevek@jmr.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 11:07:36 -0700
Actually, *all* inospherically refracted signals come down with circular polarization; that's been verified lots of times. This is why when you have both horizontally and vertically polarized antenna
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00274.html (13,090 bytes)

26. Re: [TowerTalk] Gizmotchy's (score: 1)
Author: Michael Keane K1MK <k1mk@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 14:09:45 -0400
Not really. Mechanically the configuration represents a 50% increase in wind area (and an significant increase in weight) over simply tilting a conventional yagi design at 45 degrees to the horizonta
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00275.html (9,261 bytes)

27. Re: [TowerTalk] Gizmotchy's (score: 1)
Author: Dan Zimmerman N3OX <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 14:12:22 -0400
Polarization rotation always seems fast enough that it's hard to keep up. Technically, it could matter, but it's very possible for it to cycle a time or two while you call. If the rotation is slow,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00276.html (10,192 bytes)

28. Re: [TowerTalk] Gizmotchy's (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 14:14:38 -0400
Ahhh...The 2K4 doesn't even run the legal limit. Bout 1200 watts out according to the manual. As for 6, I've worked Even the Middle East, Asia, Japan...everything except Oceana running 100 watts. Whe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00277.html (9,691 bytes)

29. Re: [TowerTalk] Gizmotchy's (score: 1)
Author: Michael Goins <wmgoins@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 13:22:56 -0500
Oaky. As you chase to post here rather than personally, I will reply. No one, at any time, said you manufactured the antennas, but selling to those you know are using them illegally is not what I wou
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00278.html (16,716 bytes)

30. Re: [TowerTalk] Gizmotchy's (score: 1)
Author: "WA6RKN" <WA6RKN@ARRL.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 12:16:48 -0700
"Bird Killer" Got a chuckle outa that one. Joe Wolfe WA6RKN Reno, Nevada _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00279.html (9,671 bytes)

31. Re: [TowerTalk] Gizmotchy's (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Hargrave" <w5ifp@gvtc.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 12:18:45 -0800
Larry, I have a better idea. I have a 14 element Hygain 2m beam. I installed a TV antenna rotor mounted horizontal at the midpoint of the Boom and rotate the beam vertical for FM and horizontal for
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00280.html (12,518 bytes)

32. Re: [TowerTalk] Gizmotchy's (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Walker" <jim@walkersdomain.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 16:12:11 -0500
I thought commercial advertising on this reflector was not allowed. Jim KB0X First off Mr.Goins, I do not make the antennas I only sell Amateur Radio Antennas. I'm sure when you went to the web site
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00285.html (14,257 bytes)

33. Re: [TowerTalk] Gizmotchy's (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Katz" <stevek@jmr.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 14:12:32 -0700
Since it's TowerTalk, does that make it appropriate to discuss reflectors on the reflector? I thought commercial advertising on this reflector was not allowed. Jim KB0X First off Mr.Goins, I do not m
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00286.html (14,130 bytes)

34. Re: [TowerTalk] Gizmotchy's (score: 1)
Author: "WA6RKN" <WA6RKN@ARRL.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 15:26:32 -0700
BOO! <<GRIN>> Joe Wolfe WA6RKN Reno, Nevada _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://list
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00289.html (8,225 bytes)

35. Re: [TowerTalk] Gizmotchy's (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 20:07:19 EDT
lack there of, in using a vertically polarized antenna as oposed to a horizontally polarized antenna for long distance work. It read that there is little significant difference between the two at the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00296.html (9,001 bytes)

36. Re: [TowerTalk] Gizmotchy's (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 20:15:24 EDT
He said he was an antenna dealer. It wasn't commercial advertising, although it would be discouraged if it was. OTOH I encourage dealers and manufacturers to participate in TT. After all, they're the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00298.html (8,824 bytes)

37. Re: [TowerTalk] Gizmotchy's (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 20:16:43 EDT
on the reflector? You bet. And directors and driven elements too! Cheers, Steve K7LXC **Feeling the pinch at the grocery store? Make dinner for $10 or less. (http://food.aol.com/frugal-feasts?ncid=em
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00299.html (8,290 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu