Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Greyline\s+Performance\s+antennas\s*$/: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Greyline Performance antennas (score: 1)
Author: k7lxc--- via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 21:26:01 +0000 (UTC)
Howdy, TowerTalkians -      Can anyone shed some light onto the verticals from Greyline Performance? The rationale presented sounds reasonable and I'd like some feedback onto how they actually work.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2020-10/msg00116.html (7,125 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Greyline Performance antennas (score: 1)
Author: Artek Manuals <Manuals@ArtekManuals.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 18:00:54 -0400
Steve What follows is MY OPINION take it for what it for what you paid for it which is nothing Verticals on 160 are the preferred DX (transmitting) antenna greyline or otherwise. Some well know DX'rs
/archives//html/Towertalk/2020-10/msg00117.html (10,844 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Greyline Performance antennas (score: 1)
Author: Ron WV4P <wv4ptn@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 17:23:18 -0500
I suspect he was asking about antennas from https://greylineperformance.com/ not how the performed during Greyling Propagation. Ron, WV4P _______________________________________________ _____________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2020-10/msg00118.html (11,743 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Greyline Performance antennas (score: 1)
Author: Gary K9GS <k9gs@gjschwartz.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 17:30:50 -0500
Please post to the reflector. Very interested too.73,Gary K9GS -- Original message --From: k7lxc-- via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com> Date: 10/16/20 4:26 PM (GMT-06:00) To: towertalk@contesting
/archives//html/Towertalk/2020-10/msg00119.html (8,406 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Greyline Performance antennas (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 15:55:05 -0700
Hi Steve, The website describes these as vertical dipoles. That suggests that they are helically loaded. Vertical dipoles don't need radials. They can center fed or off-center fed. The tallest of the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2020-10/msg00120.html (8,158 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Greyline Performance antennas (score: 1)
Author: Paul Dulaff <pdulaff@embarqmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 19:25:39 -0400 (EDT)
All No direct experience on this, but the reports are the customer interface for Greyline is spotty at best. Typical to get immediately charged on the credit card and getting the product 4+ months la
/archives//html/Towertalk/2020-10/msg00121.html (9,345 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Greyline Performance antennas (score: 1)
Author: Gary K9GS <k9gs@gjschwartz.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 19:27:58 -0500
A better way to describe these is that they are an off center fed vertical dipole. No helical loading. They are working on a 40 ft version. I'm seriously considering a 28 ft one over salt water.   Tu
/archives//html/Towertalk/2020-10/msg00123.html (8,796 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Greyline Performance antennas (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <ab7echo@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 18:24:35 -0700
After reading their web site, I have to say that their claims sound like a lot of unfounded fluff. They claim "lower noise", which is completely vague and physically unlikely for a vertical. They cla
/archives//html/Towertalk/2020-10/msg00124.html (9,857 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Greyline Performance antennas (score: 1)
Author: "Larry B. via TowerTalk" <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 21:40:31 -0400
These claims remind me of the Gotham V-80 Vertical I purchased in 1962. Knowing nothing about antennas at the time, I believed their PR copy that radials were not needed. Suffice it to say it did not
/archives//html/Towertalk/2020-10/msg00125.html (10,814 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Greyline Performance antennas (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 21:50:59 -0700
A point of clarification. There ARE a number of monoband and multiband vertical dipoles with decent performance, and as a class of antenna, vertical dipoles do NOT need radials. Most of them use some
/archives//html/Towertalk/2020-10/msg00127.html (10,386 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Greyline Performance antennas (score: 1)
Author: Gary <gary_mayfield@hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2020 15:43:56 +0000
I have the N0AX/K7LXC books. As Jim states they are excellent. All of their vertical tests were done with an extensive radial field. Even the antennas that claim to not need radials. I understand the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2020-10/msg00129.html (10,994 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Greyline Performance antennas (score: 1)
Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2020 11:38:58 -0500
I have a F12 Sigma 80 antenna, which is an OCF vertical dipole with inductive loading at the feed point and a hairpin match. While it *requires* a common-mode choke at the feed point, it works very w
/archives//html/Towertalk/2020-10/msg00130.html (11,318 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] Greyline Performance antennas (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2020 11:23:33 -0700
On 10/17/2020 9:38 AM, Kim Elmore wrote: I have a F12 Sigma 80 antenna, which is an OCF vertical dipole with inductive loading at the feed point and a hairpin match. While it *requires* a common-mode
/archives//html/Towertalk/2020-10/msg00131.html (10,551 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] Greyline Performance antennas (score: 1)
Author: <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2020 14:30:19 -0500
I have used Force 12 vertical dipoles on two DXpeditions, with excellent results. In 2004 I went to Falkland Islands and carried a Force 12 40XK. It was one of three antennas we used. It actually pro
/archives//html/Towertalk/2020-10/msg00132.html (12,569 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] Greyline Performance antennas (score: 1)
Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2020 15:24:19 -0500
On 10/17/2020 1:23 PM, Jim Brown wrote: On 10/17/2020 9:38 AM, Kim Elmore wrote: I have a F12 Sigma 80 antenna, which is an OCF vertical dipole with inductive loading at the feed point and a hairpin
/archives//html/Towertalk/2020-10/msg00133.html (12,189 bytes)

16. Re: [TowerTalk] Greyline Performance antennas (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2020 15:15:08 -0700
On 10/17/2020 1:24 PM, Kim Elmore wrote: Maybe I should have said "... making sure it has a good CM choke," especially since you've taught us how to make them! Even if the feed is in the center (it c
/archives//html/Towertalk/2020-10/msg00136.html (10,584 bytes)

17. Re: [TowerTalk] Greyline Performance antennas (score: 1)
Author: <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2020 17:37:57 -0500
Holy colossal vertical dipole! You guys were serious. N6BT made his antenna with pretty stout aluminum, and you found out why. It was a bear carrying it from Houston to London to Malta, but worth the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2020-10/msg00137.html (10,606 bytes)

18. Re: [TowerTalk] Greyline Performance antennas (score: 1)
Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2020 20:32:33 -0500
This is gold, Jim. Thanks much for sharing! Kim N5OP On 10/17/2020 5:15 PM, Jim Brown wrote: On 10/17/2020 1:24 PM, Kim Elmore wrote: Maybe I should have said "... making sure it has a good CM choke,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2020-10/msg00138.html (11,241 bytes)

19. Re: [TowerTalk] Greyline Performance antennas (score: 1)
Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2020 20:34:53 -0500
Yeah, it's probably the best built antenna I've seen short of towers as antennas. It's quite heavy, too. I can see why you chose to not schlep it back to the States. I hope it's serving the local clu
/archives//html/Towertalk/2020-10/msg00139.html (11,994 bytes)

20. Re: [TowerTalk] Greyline Performance antennas (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2020 22:13:59 -0400
I have not heard of Greyline until now, the listed specs for their 12' antenna are incredible: Strong, Smart, Elegant design. "Pretty" premium aluminum, No messy stubs, coils, etc. Premium-only, Made
/archives//html/Towertalk/2020-10/msg00140.html (10,159 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu