- 1. [TowerTalk] Ground Plane Model Problem (score: 1)
- Author: "K0SN" <k0sn@czo.net>
- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 21:44:18 -0600
- Gentlemen: I have been modeling a ground plane vertical antenna with elevated radials. It's made of 3" aluminum tubing at a base height of about 15 feet. My problem is EZNEC is reporting the feedpoin
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-11/msg00471.html (6,843 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TowerTalk] Ground Plane Model Problem (score: 1)
- Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
- Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 05:50:16 -0800
- What does it give if you run the model in free space? Are the radials drooped, or at right angles? I think that the GP vertical is one of the examples that comes with NEC. ___________________________
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-11/msg00475.html (7,545 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TowerTalk] Ground Plane Model Problem (score: 1)
- Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
- Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 14:34:38 +0000
- Tom, A quarter-wave vertical over a perfect ground would be about 35 Ohms, not 50-75 Ohms. But 10 Ohms still looks odd. Can you post a copy of the EZNEC file somewhere so that we can take a look? 73,
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-11/msg00476.html (8,344 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TowerTalk] Ground Plane Model Problem (score: 1)
- Author: w3kl@w3kl.com
- Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 08:15:32 -0800 (PST)
- Tom. I've modeled a 1/4 wave gp with one resonant radial (1/4 wavelength) using the dimension you provided using NEC4 and it yields an impedance (real part, at resonance) of 40 ohms. BTW, you didn't
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-11/msg00481.html (9,057 bytes)
- 5. Re: [TowerTalk] Ground Plane Model Problem (score: 1)
- Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
- Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 16:34:43 +0000
- Tom, Certainly a major flaw with your existing model is the segmentation. In some instances you had adjacent segments with a 30:1 ratio of length. You also need shorter segment lengths than you have
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-11/msg00484.html (7,356 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu