Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Grounding\,\s+portable\s+generators\,\s+field\s+day\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Grounding, portable generators, field day (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 11:44:40 -0800
Gosh... there haven't been any long threads on grounding in the last few hours, so here's another one... Here's the scenario: You're at field day, running off a generator. You've got extension cords
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00897.html (8,276 bytes)

2. RE: [TowerTalk] Grounding, portable generators, field day (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Dutson" <kjdutson@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 14:18:22 -0600
To me, the answer to your question(s) is simple. FD grounds should be for RF. It would be nice to have a safety grounding system with SPG, but few clubs have the people and other resources to put one
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00898.html (9,679 bytes)

3. RE: [TowerTalk] Grounding, portable generators, field day (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 14:44:45 -0800
At 12:18 PM 1/20/2005, Keith Dutson wrote: To me, the answer to your question(s) is simple. FD grounds should be for RF. It would be nice to have a safety grounding system with SPG, I don't think you
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00899.html (12,584 bytes)

4. RE: [TowerTalk] Grounding, portable generators, field day (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 17:39:50 -0600
Why not? All it takes is one or more driven rod(s) by the generator(s). power Strongly agree. Do the rod(s) at the generator(s), with phase, neutral, and equipment ground carried to each station on d
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00900.html (8,971 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Grounding, portable generators, field day (score: 1)
Author: "K8RI on Tower Talk" <k8ri-tower@charter.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 19:13:09 -0500
At 12:18 PM 1/20/2005, Keith Dutson wrote: To me, the answer to your question(s) is simple. FD grounds should be for RF. It would be nice to have a safety grounding system with SPG, I don't think you
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00901.html (9,576 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Grounding, portable generators, field day (score: 1)
Author: Jim Smith <jimsmith@shaw.ca>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 16:19:46 -0800
Oohh.... a fascinating topic. A minor quibble. The low power category is between 5 and 150W, not 100W, so maybe 4A per radio might be a better number if you're running radios capable of 150W like the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00902.html (8,610 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Grounding, portable generators, field day (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 18:09:39 -0800
At 04:13 PM 1/20/2005, K8RI on Tower Talk wrote: At 12:18 PM 1/20/2005, Keith Dutson wrote: To me, the answer to your question(s) is simple. FD grounds should be for RF. It would be nice to have a sa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00908.html (11,711 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Grounding, portable generators, field day (score: 1)
Author: "R. Kevin Stover" <rkstover@mchsi.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 21:01:01 -0600
Our FD power system is comprised of a 5KW generator with an 8ft copper clad rod driven in right next to the generator. The frame of the generator and the genset are grounded at that point. For distri
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00909.html (8,842 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Grounding, portable generators, field day (score: 1)
Author: "K8RI on Tower Talk" <k8ri-tower@charter.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 23:15:39 -0500
-- Original Message -- From: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net> To: "K8RI on Tower Talk" <k8ri-tower@charter.net>; <keith@dutson.net>; "'towertalk'" <towertalk@contesting.com> Sent: Thursday, January 2
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00910.html (17,502 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Grounding, portable generators, field day (score: 1)
Author: Gary Schafer <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 10:56:43 -0500
With a beam why do you add the gain in when you are below it? You are in more of a null there than you would be with a dipole. 73 Gary K4FMX K8RI on Tower Talk wrote: -- Original Message -- From: "Ji
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00920.html (19,390 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Grounding, portable generators, field day (score: 1)
Author: Gary Schafer <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 11:00:51 -0500
Why do you install a ground rod at the generator? Do you also install ground rods at each operating position? You may be better off without a ground connection. Let the ac float. Neither side is at e
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00921.html (10,641 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Grounding, portable generators, field day (score: 1)
Author: Dino Darling <k6rix@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 08:09:02 -0800
We have had some issues this year of RF getting into the GFI breakers and kicking them off (ie, that station goes down). It was happening with the distribution boxes first (every once and a while) an
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00922.html (10,009 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] Grounding, portable generators, field day (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 10:42:55 -0600
Safety codes in general require that a power system have its neutral bonded to earth within a very short distance of where it is established. In a building, that would be the service entrance. A gene
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00924.html (9,864 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] Grounding, portable generators, field day (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 12:07:53 -0800
At 08:00 AM 1/21/2005, Gary Schafer wrote: Why do you install a ground rod at the generator? Do you also install ground rods at each operating position? You may be better off without a ground connect
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00929.html (10,580 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu