- 1. [TowerTalk] Guy Cable (score: 1)
- Author: "Larry Comden" <lcomden@comcast.net>
- Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 17:37:29 -0400
- TT'ers: I'm going to replace the guy wires on my Rohn 25 tower this spring as part of a general overhaul. Present cable is 3/16 1X7 wire rope (probably EHS but after 30 years who remembers?). No insu
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00205.html (7,132 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TowerTalk] Guy Cable (score: 1)
- Author: Robert Morris <robrk@nidhog.net>
- Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 18:20:31 -0400
- After you price the extra insulators,grips,clamps and sore fingers, price out Phillystran.... _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00208.html (6,886 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TowerTalk] Guy Cable (score: 1)
- Author: "W3YY - Bob" <w3yy@cox.net>
- Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 23:34:48 -0000
- Bob - Amen 73, Bob - W3YY --Original Message-- From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Robert Morris Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 10:21 PM To: L
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00209.html (7,275 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TowerTalk] Guy Cable (score: 1)
- Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m@msn.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 20:19:21 -0400
- My understanding is that EHS is "galvanized steel cable", which is not the same as wire rope. While they might have the same breaking strength, other characteristics may be quite different, such as a
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00210.html (8,605 bytes)
- 5. Re: [TowerTalk] Guy Cable (score: 1)
- Author: Tom Anderson <WW5L@gte.net>
- Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 19:28:31 -0500
- I wouldn't use anything but Phillystran. In addition to the strength, I think it looks a whole lot better than guy cables and big insulators. My own opinion though. 73 de Tom, WW5L __________________
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00211.html (7,898 bytes)
- 6. Re: [TowerTalk] Guy Cable (score: 1)
- Author: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>
- Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 20:35:34 -0500
- I echo these comments. A friend used wire rope and big grips. It did not hold. He replaced all with Phillystran with 20' EHS leader at each guy post. 73, Keith NM5G My understanding is that EHS is "g
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00213.html (9,275 bytes)
- 7. Re: [TowerTalk] Guy Cable (score: 1)
- Author: Eric Scace K3NA <eric@k3na.org>
- Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 22:41:53 -0400
- Do not use 19 strand wire rope. It is designed for a different application (runs around pulleys, etc), and comes in many different designs (Warrington vs Seale cross-sections, right regular, right la
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00214.html (9,493 bytes)
- 8. Re: [TowerTalk] Guy Cable (score: 1)
- Author: "W3YY - Bob" <w3yy@cox.net>
- Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 03:16:56 -0000
- Well, I have to confess that I don't know exactly what the term "wire rope" means, but I successfully used 7x19 galvanized aircraft control cable (both 3/16" and 1/4") for guys for 30 years. This mak
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00215.html (10,631 bytes)
- 9. Re: [TowerTalk] Guy Cable (score: 1)
- Author: K7LXC@aol.com
- Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 09:44:11 EDT
- same as wire rope. Rope is "a strong, thick line or cord, commonly one composed of twisted or braided strands of hemp, flax, or the like, or of wire or other material". And technically, it's only cor
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00220.html (9,184 bytes)
- 10. Re: [TowerTalk] Guy Cable (score: 1)
- Author: Eric Scace K3NA <eric@k3na.org>
- Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 08:41:20 -0400
- "Wire rope" is also a technical term used in the rigging industry. It covers all forms of steel cable that have been discussed in this email thread, including "aircraft cable". Choosing a wire rope d
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00244.html (11,289 bytes)
- 11. Re: [TowerTalk] Guy Cable (score: 1)
- Author: "W3YY - Bob" <w3yy@cox.net>
- Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 23:03:01 -0000
- Eric - possible. But that's not what aircraft the top of a paint can, too... stretchy than 7-strand wire rope under could be a problem at another. Eric, I consider you a friend, but that was a real p
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00253.html (13,317 bytes)
- 12. Re: [TowerTalk] Guy Cable (score: 1)
- Author: "K8RI" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
- Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 20:34:32 -0400
- My self, I still prefer Phillystran or how ever it's spelled, but I'd not be concerned using "wire rope" with the proper specifications to guy a tower. The last commercial tower I climbed which was j
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00255.html (8,653 bytes)
- 13. Re: [TowerTalk] Guy Cable (score: 1)
- Author: Randy <randy@gte.net>
- Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 22:16:10 -0500
- Bob: FWIW: I don't know either of you, and, so, don't mean to intrude... "but".... I read Eric's post, and did not see it, from my perspective, as anything bad directed towards you. The written word
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00259.html (8,270 bytes)
- 14. Re: [TowerTalk] Guy Cable (score: 1)
- Author: W2RU - Bud Hippisley <W2RU@frontiernet.net>
- Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 03:45:26 +0000
- The recent discussions about whether wire "rope" is suitable for guying towers seem to me to have mostly missed the primary issue, which I believe is this: In many guyed tower configurations, a major
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00263.html (8,877 bytes)
- 15. Re: [TowerTalk] Guy Cable (score: 1)
- Author: "K8RI" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
- Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 00:38:52 -0400
- You have to remember that a deep catenary in a high mass guy is the equivelant of stretch as far as movement of the tower is concerned. Having been "up there" on some pretty windy days, I've found t
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00264.html (10,736 bytes)
- 16. Re: [TowerTalk] Guy Cable (score: 1)
- Author: W2RU - Bud Hippisley <W2RU@frontiernet.net>
- Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 13:42:28 +0000
- Very good point, Roger. My comments were in response to the discussion about *other* types of wire rope vs. the conventional EHS we use -- all of which I would treat as "high mass" guys. I wasn't att
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00270.html (8,566 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu