Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Guy\s+wire\s+anchoring\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Guy\s+wire\s+anchoring\s+question\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Guy wire anchoring question (score: 1): Author: wa9wsj@yahoo.com (Tom Mattus); Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2001 13:29:13 -0700 (PDT); Hello again gents! I've been doing my research with the "prime directive" in mind, but, would like to know the collective's opinion's/pro's/con's/concerns about guys tied to an extended pipe or I bea; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-04/msg00011.html (7,950 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Guy wire anchoring question (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2001 18:45:25 EDT; Of course they can be SAFE - you just have to engineer them properly. I-beam (eye-beam) is the material to use as it is stronger than a similar sized pipe. A proper elevated guy anchor is very robust; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-04/msg00013.html (8,229 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Guy wire anchoring question (score: 1): Author: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider); Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2001 23:27:03 +0100; Elevated guy anchors will do what you want if you have them properly engineered, as I did. I totally agree with Steve. I had a PE design the guying system, I did the mechanical drawings and contracte; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-04/msg00014.html (9,420 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Guy wire anchoring question (score: 1): Author: rthorne@tcac.net (Richard Thorne); Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2001 18:55:10 -0500; Tom: I used I-Beams when I lived in Wake Forest, NC. It helped keep the wires above the ground so the kids would not run into them. It held up a 90' 25g tower quite well. I had 4 or 5 feet in the gro; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-04/msg00015.html (8,667 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] Guy wire anchoring question (score: 1): Author: w6ter@worldnet.att.net (Gerald Smith); Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2001 03:33:13 -0500; I too had an engineer design elevated guy anchors. The alternative to an I-beam, I used, is structural steel tubing. Mine is 5 inch square, 3/8 wall by 10 feet resulting in 5 feet above grade. Rememb; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-04/msg00023.html (8,930 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] Guy wire anchoring question (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 08:28:25 EDT; Steel tubing 5 inch square? I'm a little confused - please elaborate. What grade is the steel tubing? Any idea what the bending moment is? Just curious. Are these flanges? How big do they have to be?; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-04/msg00024.html (7,891 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] Guy wire anchoring question (score: 1): Author: w6ter@worldnet.att.net (Gerald Smith); Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2001 07:32:44 -0500; Actually, I don't know the bending moment. The PE, having reviewed the Rohn documentation and listening to my desires, specified steel tubing. It is commononly used in buildings. It is very heavy. F; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-04/msg00025.html (8,020 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] Guy wire anchoring question (score: 1): Author: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider); Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 18:32:16 +0100; I had my guy anchors engineered by a PE as well. Complete details will be forthcoming on my Website and I'll announce it here. My 10 ft 8 inch I Beam 6 ft elevated guy anchors have a 1/2 inch thick,; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-04/msg00032.html (8,475 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]