Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Guyed\s+self\-supporters\s+\(was\s+\"Concrete\s+suggestions\"\)\s*$/: 38 ]

Total 38 documents matching your query.

21. [TowerTalk] Guyed self-supporters (was "Concrete suggestions") (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com)
Date: Fri Apr 18 09:28:13 2003
to Herr TT Administrator. As far as I am aware I tried to present some reasoning based on engineering knowledge. If you or anyone wants calculations for a specific design or situation, you can contra
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-04/msg00323.html (10,690 bytes)

22. [TowerTalk] Guyed self-supporters (was "Concrete suggestions") (score: 1)
Author: k1ttt@arrl.net (David Robbins K1TTT)
Date: Fri Apr 18 09:40:03 2003
$1000 certain placed Un-possible. You have stated a problem where no one could win. By requiring a 'properly designed' tower and 'properly placed' guy wires you could take any example sent and say i
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-04/msg00324.html (10,342 bytes)

23. [TowerTalk] Guyed self-supporters (was "Concrete suggestions") (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com)
Date: Fri Apr 18 10:18:49 2003
The 'properly' was put in to avoid smart alec situation by someone putting guy wires on 100ft tower at 10ft off the ground and trying to snatch the purse. Implies reasonable situations like lets say
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-04/msg00325.html (11,931 bytes)

24. [TowerTalk] Guyed self-supporters (was "Concrete suggestions") (score: 1)
Author: w7ry@centurytel.net (Jim W7RY)
Date: Fri Apr 18 10:22:26 2003
Could not have said it better myself. Thanks for all your input Yuri! 73 Jim W7RY engineering to snapping ignoramuses to
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-04/msg00326.html (10,371 bytes)

25. [TowerTalk] Guyed self-supporters (was "Concrete suggestions") (score: 1)
Author: chris@g3vbl.co.uk (Chris Pedder)
Date: Fri Apr 18 11:52:29 2003
I find myself in the strange situation of agreeing with Yuri on this one! I qualify this by stating that I am merely a mathematician and not an engineer. Engineers like to solve problems, I get my ki
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-04/msg00329.html (10,491 bytes)

26. [TowerTalk] Guyed self-supporters (was "Concrete suggestions") (score: 1)
Author: olinger@bellsouth.net (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
Date: Fri Apr 18 13:04:33 2003
Seems to be an awful lot of air time trying to kill fleas on the elephant. An earlier post is correct that the tower flexibility necessary to engage guy wires is quite missing on self supporting towe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-04/msg00333.html (13,276 bytes)

27. [TowerTalk] Guyed self-supporters (was "Concrete suggestions") (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com)
Date: Fri Apr 18 13:18:25 2003
Sorry to put you in that situation, but I defend and stand up for truth, if this is not the place for it, then I am sorry to cause waves. Yuri
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-04/msg00334.html (9,779 bytes)

28. [TowerTalk] Guyed self-supporters (was "Concrete suggestions") (score: 1)
Author: stevek@jmr.com (Steve Katz)
Date: Fri Apr 18 13:44:53 2003
Guy, that was a great discussion -- thanks. When I think of "self supporting," my first thoughts go to crank-ups, since those are the only self-supporting towers I've ever owned. Even the crank-ups a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-04/msg00335.html (15,899 bytes)

29. [TowerTalk] Guyed self-supporters (was "Concrete suggestions") (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com)
Date: Fri Apr 18 16:50:14 2003
If the fleas will not go away, what's elephant got to do? Seems some reasons are presented, so I will try to engage one more time. I hope it is shining some light on the problem and will save someone
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-04/msg00338.html (17,927 bytes)

30. [TowerTalk] Guyed self-supporters (was "Concrete suggestions") (score: 1)
Author: olinger@bellsouth.net (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
Date: Fri Apr 18 17:13:13 2003
I stand by my post. 73, Guy. To: <towertalk@contesting.com> ..snip.. 73, Guy K2AV
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-04/msg00340.html (9,387 bytes)

31. [TowerTalk] Guyed self-supporters (was "Concrete suggestions") (score: 1)
Author: on4kj@skynet.be (on4kj)
Date: Fri Apr 18 17:40:03 2003
This make sens to me Guy. (Guess we have the same age.....;) Have not got that much experience using the mathematics i learned once ...since I was active as a after sales manager. I installed what ot
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-04/msg00344.html (15,586 bytes)

32. [TowerTalk] Guyed self-supporters (was "Concrete suggestions") (score: 1)
Author: W2fca@cs.com (W2fca@cs.com)
Date: Fri Apr 18 20:22:02 2003
Does that mean that on a 100 foot tower guyed with 3/16 EHS at the recommended tension that those guy wires will be stretching on the order of several inches or more? Frank W2FCA
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-04/msg00350.html (9,521 bytes)

33. [TowerTalk] Guyed self-supporters (was "Concrete suggestions") (score: 1)
Author: hankarn@pacbell.net (Dan Arney)
Date: Fri Apr 18 20:46:23 2003
My 70' Skyneedle is rock steady, with 25' mast up total height of 95'. NO GUYs Hank KN6DI
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-04/msg00351.html (9,037 bytes)

34. [TowerTalk] Guyed self-supporters (was "Concrete suggestions") (score: 1)
Author: olinger@bellsouth.net (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
Date: Fri Apr 18 21:02:54 2003
No, EHS guys are not stretching to give this effect. The guys are not tightened to make them straight, they are tightened to present a certain designed tension on the tower. If you sight down them, y
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-04/msg00352.html (11,492 bytes)

35. [TowerTalk] Guyed self-supporters (was "Concrete suggestions") (score: 1)
Author: W2fca@cs.com (W2fca@cs.com)
Date: Fri Apr 18 22:21:35 2003
In a message dated 4/18/03 21:23:02 Eastern Daylight Time, olinger@bellsouth.net writes: << If you sight down them, you will see that they are not pulled "straight-line" taut. They have a certain "bo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-04/msg00355.html (9,509 bytes)

36. [TowerTalk] Guyed self-supporters (was "Concrete suggestions") (score: 1)
Author: jimlux@earthlink.net (Jim Lux)
Date: Fri Apr 18 22:39:56 2003
http://home.earthlink.net/~jimlux/radio/math/catenary.htm has some equations to get you started. -- Original Message -- From: <W2fca@cs.com> To: <towertalk@contesting.com> Sent: Friday, April 18, 200
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-04/msg00356.html (10,590 bytes)

37. [TowerTalk] Guyed self-supporters (was "Concrete suggestions") (score: 1)
Author: w3wv@att.net (w3wv@att.net)
Date: Sat Apr 19 00:49:48 2003
Yes, of course the EHS guys are not stretching (noticeably), but that's not really the point (although it was the original question). It seems to me that the physical extent of the catenary is pretty
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-04/msg00361.html (13,986 bytes)

38. [TowerTalk] Guyed self-supporters (was "Concrete suggestions") (score: 1)
Author: olinger@bellsouth.net (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
Date: Sat Apr 19 12:30:59 2003
Taking one's breath away is a measure of psychological effect. Inches is the physical measure and can be seen with a transit on the ground. These are not self-contradictory statements. The movement o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-04/msg00364.html (18,006 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu