Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Guyed\s+vs\s+Self\s+Supporting\s+Lattice\s+towers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Guyed\s+vs\s+Self\s+Supporting\s+Lattice\s+towers\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Guyed vs Self Supporting Lattice towers (score: 1): Author: "Bill Clausen" <bclausen@co.volusia.fl.us>; Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 16:36:57 -0400; Does anyone know a good source (s) (articles, websites) on the pros and cons of guyed towers vs self supporting lattice towers? _______________________________________________ _______________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-08/msg00346.html (6,865 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Guyed vs Self Supporting Lattice towers (score: 1): Author: "Dan Hearn" <dhearn@air-pipe.com>; Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 14:48:05 -0700; Bill: I think the pros and cons depend upon the height of tower you are talking about. For towers over a hundred feet or so the guyed tower wins due to much lower cost. The shorter the tower the bett; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-08/msg00348.html (8,543 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Guyed vs Self Supporting Lattice towers (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com; Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 15:58:12 EDT; cons of guyed towers vs self supporting lattice towers? Umm, don't know of anything like that myself. Basically the cost of a tower is the cost of the steel. A self-supporting tower needs lots more s; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-08/msg00401.html (8,863 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]