Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+H\s+frame\s+for\s+10\s+or\s+15m\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] H frame for 10 or 15m (score: 1)
Author: Stein Roar LA6FJA-K3RAG <s-roabr@online.no>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 21:30:07 +0200 (MEST)
Hi does anyone have ideas sizes for a H frame for 4-5 el yagies for 10 m and 15m ? is it 1/2 wl , 3/4 wl or 1 wl spacing ?? I saw one from http://www.arraysolutions.com/Users/h2a.jpg Arraysollution f
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-08/msg00130.html (6,809 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] H frame for 10 or 15m (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:29:50 -0700
Why would anyone want to do this, instead of the conventional wisdom of vertical stacking and/or using longer Yagi's? Rick N6RK _______________________________________________ _______________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-08/msg00131.html (7,212 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] H frame for 10 or 15m (score: 1)
Author: "s-roabr@online.no" <s-roabr@online.no>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 23:10:01 +0200
I have a lot of aluminium tubes which fits for short boom yagi for 10 and 15. Long boom is not good with heavy snow and icing in norway. Why would anyone want to do this, instead of the conventional
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-08/msg00132.html (7,993 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] H frame for 10 or 15m (score: 1)
Author: "DF3KV" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 00:29:39 +0200
Many contest and VHF stations do that. Long boom yagis need a lot of turning radius and spacing. I am going to built one for 10m if the band improves. 5/8 wave length stacking distance is imho the mi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-08/msg00134.html (8,248 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] H frame for 10 or 15m (score: 1)
Author: TexasRF@aol.com
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 20:58:13 -0400 (EDT)
Each yagi design has an optimum stacking distance. There is no universal rule for stacking if you want the best performance. Short boom yagis have lower gain and closer stacking distance. Long boom y
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-08/msg00138.html (8,794 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] H frame for 10 or 15m (score: 1)
Author: "Gene Fuller" <w2lu@rochester.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 21:22:16 -0400
I would guess that with an "H" frame array you would get the increased gain of four yagis with less required turning radius, broader vertical beamwidth, narrower horizontal beamwidth and possibly a s
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-08/msg00141.html (9,869 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] H frame for 10 or 15m (score: 1)
Author: Jay Kesterson K0GU <k0gu@verinet.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 19:36:53 -0600
Your best bet if possible is to model the antennas and look at the gain compared to one antenna and the patterns. The wider the horizontal spacing the bigger your first side lobes. That may not be a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-08/msg00142.html (9,785 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] H frame for 10 or 15m (score: 1)
Author: "Brobakken, LA6FJA K3RAG" <s-roabr@online.no>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 04:30:00 +0200
THANKS FOR NICE MODELLING! Your best bet if possible is to model the antennas and look at the gain compared to one antenna and the patterns. The wider the horizontal spacing the bigger your first sid
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-08/msg00143.html (9,714 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] H frame for 10 or 15m (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 08:12:16 -0400
But.... When modeling a vertical stack, it is important to include the ground in your model. Free-space modeling does not take advantage of ground reflection. X/2X/3X spacing is a standard (where X i
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-08/msg00147.html (12,272 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] H frame for 10 or 15m (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 09:17:50 -0400
The advantage of an H-Frame ranges from somewhat less than 5 dB for systems with less than optimum spacing to slightly more than 6 dB with maximum gain spacing. Without doing the modeling, one can l
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-08/msg00150.html (14,548 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] H frame for 10 or 15m (score: 1)
Author: Jay Kesterson K0GU <k0gu@verinet.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 07:33:07 -0600
The azimuth pattern will be much the same over ground. If you vertically stack antennas very close together you can see interaction between the antennas that can degrade the azimuth pattern. Although
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-08/msg00151.html (14,373 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] H frame for 10 or 15m (score: 1)
Author: "DF3KV" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 15:38:09 +0200
My modelling for the planned 4x104CA stack is done by EZNEC and HFTA. I did not write that the vertical stack of 4 yagis cannot provide a desired 10° vertical lobe. Of course it can by proper combina
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-08/msg00152.html (13,720 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] H frame for 10 or 15m (score: 1)
Author: Jay Kesterson K0GU <k0gu@verinet.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 07:54:02 -0600
Just take into account that VE7BQH's fine antenna array information is a maximum gain design for EME. The first side lobes in the azimuth are only down around 12 db from the main lobe in many of thos
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-08/msg00153.html (9,116 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] H frame for 10 or 15m (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 10:34:07 -0400
VE7BQH's information also uses free space designs since EME generally involves elevation above the horizon. Some can argue that HF use is better served by a more narrow but taller array which would c
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-08/msg00154.html (11,299 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] H frame for 10 or 15m (score: 1)
Author: "W5PR" <W5PR@swbell.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 11:05:48 -0500
I use greater spacing than has been described in this thread. (30' for 24' boom 5el 6m antennas and 50' for 7el 48' boom 10m antennas) The forward gain is higher. Why should I worry about the side lo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-08/msg00157.html (13,268 bytes)

16. Re: [TowerTalk] H frame for 10 or 15m (score: 1)
Author: Jay Kesterson K0GU <k0gu@verinet.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 10:32:09 -0600
Well if you like the big side lobes as they give you more coverage in contests why did you cut the beam width of your main lobe in half by using an H-Frame?? <rhetorical question> 73, Jay K0GU ______
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-08/msg00159.html (9,343 bytes)

17. Re: [TowerTalk] H frame for 10 or 15m (score: 1)
Author: "W5PR" <W5PR@swbell.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 11:51:15 -0500
I do not use an H frame, I was just talking about the spacing. If I had an H frame, I would use closer spacing to cut down on the construction problems. I should have clarified this. Chuck W5PR _____
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-08/msg00160.html (10,166 bytes)

18. Re: [TowerTalk] H frame for 10 or 15m (score: 1)
Author: "Stein Roar Brobakken" <s-roabr@online.no>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 00:51:01 +0200
Thank you all guys for sharing thoughts and ideas with this subject. Will start with 4 over 4 on 10m first... then we will see what we can do on 15m and in future on 10m. 73s and see yaa in contest L
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-08/msg00198.html (11,540 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu