Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+HAAT\s+calculator\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+HAAT\s+calculator\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] HAAT calculator (score: 1): Author: Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net>; Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2006 11:01:26 -0500; Seems to work well with inputted GPS data. The results all seem reasonable. I guess I won't be doing much LOS DXing! 73 and thanks for the info. Joe _______________________________________________ __; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00154.html (8,920 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] HAAT calculator (score: 1): Author: "D. Scott MacKenzie" <kb0fhp@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 16:49:37 -0500; OK - I tried it - and not surprisingly, it shows I am down in a hole - with the average decifficent being -14 meters. The only way out is to raise the antennas substantially, or use a much higher ang; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00162.html (9,832 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] HAAT calculator (score: 1): Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>; Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 14:18:15 -0800; 14 meters or 14 degrees, Scott? If 14 meters, it may not be too bad depending on how far away the obstruction is. If 14 degrees, then be prepared for some disappointment in pileups, especially during; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00163.html (9,480 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] HAAT calculator (score: 1): Author: "D. Scott MacKenzie" <kb0fhp@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 17:34:29 -0500; Recorrected the data. That is the average -28 meters, with many much higher....Using a simple vertical, and I work most people I hear. but it is a long fight.....range is -60 to 2 meters..... --Origi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00164.html (10,298 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] HAAT calculator (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2006 20:02:39 -0500; For HF operation, HAAT is fundamentally irrelevant. Average terrain elevation from 43KM to 16 KM is, at most, only a small part of the picture. The best tool available for hams is HFTA (HF Terrain An; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00165.html (11,363 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] HAAT calculator (score: 1): Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>; Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2006 20:43:00 -0600; Just to illustrate N4ZR's comment, I fired up HFTA and created a fictious terrain, one that a very good local terrain near the antenna, but had a lot of high stuff in the distance. If you used the we; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00166.html (8,620 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]