Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+HAM\s+III\s+x\s+HAM\s+IV\s+and\s+others\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] HAM III x HAM IV and others (score: 1)
Author: "PY1KS - Alex" <py1ks.alex@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 17:22:15 -0300
Hi guys, A friend of mine offer me a HAM III just used for 3 years only, and I got a HAM IV not so good condition, in fact, I donīt know if it's working effectively. And I wonder if YAESU G-800DXA or
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-06/msg00047.html (6,851 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] HAM III x HAM IV and others (score: 1)
Author: "Mike DeChristopher, K1KAA" <k1kaa@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2008 17:27:08 -0400
Ham IV is a beefier rotor for bigger antennas. What are you going to spin with the rotor? Ham IV is rated for 15 sqft windload. Ham III is 12.5 sqft. All depends on how big your antennas are. -- Mike
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-06/msg00048.html (8,292 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] HAM III x HAM IV and others (score: 1)
Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 17:33:57 EDT
Although the "Ham" series may be rated at 12.5 and 15 for the Ham 3 and Ham 4, in the real world it ain't so. Having used the 4 series and the Tailtwister for years, experience prevents me from putti
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-06/msg00049.html (7,896 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] HAM III x HAM IV and others (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2008 02:29:10 -0400
The "Ham series" of rotators are good, well designed rotators. they just aren't meant for large antennas and particularly antennas near their ratings in his winds. Other than that they work great and
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-06/msg00064.html (8,307 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] HAM III x HAM IV and others (score: 1)
Author: Rob Frohne <rob.frohne@wallawalla.edu>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 05:36:22 -0700
Bill, et. al., I agree that the Ham series rotors will have problems with big antennas, however, if you are on a budget and you know about the modes of failure, you can make them work. Two of the rul
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-06/msg00101.html (9,974 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] HAM III x HAM IV and others (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2008 12:51:10 -0400
Having used to old Ham series on antennas as large as full size KLM 5L 20 meter and 6 L 15 meter antennas (42 foot booms) I'd add two points: Don't use the rotator when the wind is strong. If necessa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-06/msg00104.html (11,821 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] HAM III x HAM IV and others (score: 1)
Author: Rob Frohne <rob.frohne@wallawalla.edu>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 20:08:44 -0700
Hi Roger, et. al., When the wind really blows, I hold the brake down and let the antenna rotate by turning the motor to the direction it wishes to be. I then release the brake lever so the brake is r
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-06/msg00116.html (9,092 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] HAM III x HAM IV and others (score: 1)
Author: Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net>
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2008 14:32:13 -0400
I have stayed out of this discussion because things mechanical are not my strong suit, and I have had my share of rotor problems lately. At any rate, several months ago I had a discussion with Craig,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-06/msg00124.html (11,387 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] HAM III x HAM IV and others (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2008 15:01:05 -0400
I think that is basically what I've been saying. But as to detail the gears in the Ham series of rotators as well as some of the Yaesu rotators I've seen are very thin, stamped steel. They uses a ser
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-06/msg00126.html (13,344 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu