- 1. [TowerTalk] HDBX???? (score: 1)
- Author: xanadulove@connectcorp.net (Larry W3OZ)
- Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 08:11:47 -0800
- I had 40 feet of HBDX up for 12 years with no problems. Had 3 monobanders on it. One boom over 32 feet. Total of 23sq. ft. I did as the other ham on the reflector did and mounted the rotor at the bot
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00517.html (8,176 bytes)
- 2. [TowerTalk] HDBX???? (score: 1)
- Author: n7ex@athenet.net (Dave_K9NX)
- Date: Sat, 30 Jan 1999 03:30:01 +0000
- . There are a lot better towers out there today that you could put up As a former HDBX oener I would echo all of W3OZ comments here. Another thing to remeber is that you can easliy spend $300+ just f
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00580.html (7,641 bytes)
- 3. [TowerTalk] HDBX???? (score: 1)
- Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
- Date: Sat, 30 Jan 1999 10:35:54 EST
- I was really excited when I bought my first tower - a used BX - about 20 years ago for $150. After stripping and repainting it (I'll never do that again!), I embarked on the tower and antenna instal
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00581.html (7,684 bytes)
- 4. [TowerTalk] HDBX???? (score: 1)
- Author: larsenp@cadvision.com (Peter Larsen)
- Date: Sat, 30 Jan 1999 17:02:56 +0000
- Doing it right is never cheap!! I have 2 meters of 35 mpa concrete under my 35 footer. Over kill is a lot better than getting killed. -- 73 es have fun Peter VE6YC DO21wc ____________________________
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00585.html (7,488 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu