- 1. [TowerTalk] HDBX Question (score: 1)
- Author: <jacobsen_5@msn.com>
- Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 20:48:10 -0500
- How do Tower Talkers. Are you ready for this?? A R E A L question about towers!!! I need you search your "grey matter" soft drives. (Maybe more chance the old timers have the answer) Does anyone reme
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00031.html (6,747 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TowerTalk] HDBX Question (score: 1)
- Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
- Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 22:07:02 -0400
- As I recall each section is stepped at the top so additional sections would get a little smaller with each addition. I've never seen a straight section for those. That's not to say they don't exist,
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00033.html (8,570 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TowerTalk] HDBX Question (score: 1)
- Author: <jacobsen_5@msn.com>
- Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 21:46:14 -0500
- I was looking for info on a HBX tower section to extend a HDBX 48 to a HDBX 56. After much searching/Googleing I may have found my own answer. It seems that Critical towers/Thomas Shelby & co., who h
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00036.html (7,563 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TowerTalk] HDBX Question (score: 1)
- Author: n8de@thepoint.net
- Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2007 22:47:29 -0400
- All the BX type sections were tapered and it was possible to extend to 64' with two more sections, but climbing them was a PITA. Don N8DE Quoting jacobsen_5@msn.com: _________________________________
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00037.html (8,275 bytes)
- 5. Re: [TowerTalk] HDBX Question (score: 1)
- Author: "Mike K9MI" <mike@k9mi.com>
- Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 03:37:51 -0000
- I don't think so Jake, but I could be wrong. Sounds like a bad idea anyway. 73, Mike K9MI _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mai
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00041.html (8,592 bytes)
- 6. Re: [TowerTalk] HDBX Question (score: 1)
- Author: K7LXC@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 08:05:49 EDT
- towers!!! Always appreciated - hi. old timers have the answer) Does anyone remember if a straight tower section is/was made to extend a Rohn HDBX 48 into a HDBX 56??? Either Rohn or after market mfg?
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00050.html (8,640 bytes)
- 7. Re: [TowerTalk] HDBX Question (score: 1)
- Author: "Dave N0RQ" <n0rq-lists@sbcglobal.net>
- Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 08:33:46 -0500
- The older Rohn HDAX had straight sections available. I have two of them, actually (not in the air). -- Dave N0RQ http://www.powerlinenoise.com _______________________________________________ ________
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00055.html (8,978 bytes)
- 8. Re: [TowerTalk] HDBX Question (score: 1)
- Author: Tom Anderson <WW5L@gte.net>
- Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 10:50:56 -0500
- Jake: Yes, I know of at least two hams near me that did just that. IF I remember correctly they just bought a second top section for an HDBX 48 and bolted it onto the top of the 48ft tower. Tom, WW5L
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00073.html (8,953 bytes)
- 9. Re: [TowerTalk] HDBX Question (score: 1)
- Author: Tom Anderson <WW5L@gte.net>
- Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 11:13:19 -0500
- FYI: Before I get flamed, yes, this was the way at least one ham did it, bolting a second section to the TOP of his HDBX 48 to make an HBX 56. He already had the bottom section concreted in, so he ju
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00074.html (10,161 bytes)
- 10. Re: [TowerTalk] HDBX Question (score: 1)
- Author: Mike Miller <wa0zog@embarqmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2007 00:53:16 -0500
- Wow! Just catching up on my email and catching the thread about the HDBX tower...finally. That's what I've got up here waiting for the beam to get finished. I've put up an HDBX 40, but I've got the r
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00120.html (8,641 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu