- 21. Re: [TowerTalk] HF Vertical Opinions NEEDED... (score: 1)
- Author: "Mike Fatchett" <mike@mallardcove.com>
- Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 17:47:29 -0700
- I don't have any other verticals to compare it to. I don't know if the publication K7LXC was citing includes the R8. I worked plenty of DX with it this weekend but I don't have anything to comapare i
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00717.html (12,626 bytes)
- 22. Re: [TowerTalk] HF Vertical Opinions NEEDED... (score: 1)
- Author: Bob Nielsen <nielsen@oz.net>
- Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 17:03:09 -0800
- Yes, it does include the R8, but it wasn't elevated much and there was a ground screen. Based on the results quoted, I was seriously looking at the R8, but the AV-640 is nearly identical except for n
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00718.html (15,129 bytes)
- 23. Re: [TowerTalk] HF Vertical Opinions NEEDED... (score: 1)
- Author: "Tim Kass" <timkass@hotmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 08:57:27 -0500
- Here in Ohio verticals don't do such a great job, poor soil, I have had many vertical including the Hytower - I would recommend one of the mounted verticals such as the Gap Titan or perhaps the Cushc
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00833.html (14,720 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu