- 1. [TowerTalk] HF2V Elevated or On Ground - Redux (score: 1)
- Author: "James Setzler" <jms_k1sd@verizon.net>
- Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 13:31:28 -0500
- Mike, Thanks to you and everyone who responded the my question about the Butternut HF2V. There is a wealth of information that was shared and I've been doing a lot of research in the last few days. T
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-11/msg00402.html (7,305 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TowerTalk] HF2V Elevated or On Ground - Redux (score: 1)
- Author: "Mike & Coreen Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
- Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 17:08:40 -0400
- Hey Jim, Howzitgoingeh?...that?s Canadian for ??Sup?? Good to know you are making progress. Of course, I don?t have a 2V, but a 9V, but they are nearly identical, except for # of bands.. I did not tu
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-11/msg00403.html (11,436 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TowerTalk] HF2V Elevated or On Ground - Redux (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 23:16:14 -0800
- Hi Mike, I've not looked at that, but in general, the closer radials get to the earth, the great the loss. I would worry a lot less about SWR and a lot more about ground losses. Thanks for all our ma
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-11/msg00426.html (8,047 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu