Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+HFTA\s+and\s+diferent\s+bands\s+antennas\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] HFTA and diferent bands antennas (score: 1)
Author: "Jorge Diez - CX6VM" <cx6vm.jorge@adinet.com.uy>
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 09:28:51 -0300
Hello, I am trying HFTA, really very interesting the info from it. I model for different antennas, also for a stack of monobanders. BUT, how can I add a different antenna to this model? For example I
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-04/msg00737.html (7,854 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] HFTA and diferent bands antennas (score: 1)
Author: Stan Stockton <k5go@cox.net>
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 07:41:04 -0500
Jorge, HFTA assumes nominal gain figures for antennas containing a certain number of elements for a certain band. It does not model the performance characteristics of a particular antenna design for
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-04/msg00738.html (8,641 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] HFTA and diferent bands antennas (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 08:57:52 -0400
No, it is not possible, I'm afraid. There's not yet any svh thing as a Swiss Army Knife that combines the terrain capabilities of HFTA with the antenna modeling abilities of NEC. Maybe some day... 73
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-04/msg00739.html (9,392 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] HFTA and diferent bands antennas (score: 1)
Author: "Jorge Diez - CX6VM" <cx6vm.jorge@adinet.com.uy>
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 10:11:19 -0300
Not good news, hi hi... HFTA is very easy to use, not NEC, at least for me.! Is incredible how an antenna vary with only few feets of height, I´m knowing some interesting things from my station. I ha
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-04/msg00740.html (10,439 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] HFTA and diferent bands antennas (score: 1)
Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 07:09:54 -0700
HFTA doesn't model antenna:antenna interactions, which is why the user instructions caution about putting antennas too close together. (because at small distances they DO interact, and HFTA ignores i
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-04/msg00744.html (8,532 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] HFTA and diferent bands antennas (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 12:34:02 -0700
The REAL Swiss Army knife for antenna modeling would, in my opinion, combine the terrain analysis of HFTA with the antenna modeling capability of NEC .... and do it for both transmit and receive. I r
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-04/msg00748.html (9,227 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] HFTA and diferent bands antennas (score: 1)
Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 17:52:53 -0700
I don't know about that... That would imply a violation of reciprocity, wouldn't it? I would believe non-symmetric propagation via skywave, but not that the "effective antenna pattern" is different f
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-04/msg00756.html (9,658 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] HFTA and diferent bands antennas (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 18:08:45 -0700
Not necessarily. See below. The word "effective" is an important qualifier here. What HFTA does is attempt to model interaction of the wavefront with terrain. So it isn't the antenna pattern that's c
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-04/msg00757.html (8,950 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] HFTA and diferent bands antennas (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 20:32:29 -0700
No ... it doesn't really have anything to do about propagation reciprocity through the ionosphere. It is all about non-symmetry of terrain. As a simple example, picture a tall distant peak with a sho
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-04/msg00764.html (11,096 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] HFTA and diferent bands antennas (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 11:04:27 -0400
If you think about your example of the two ground peaks at different heights, what would the shadow of the larger one have to do with direction? If the receive path has the small peak in the shadow o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-04/msg00773.html (13,799 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] HFTA and diferent bands antennas (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 09:08:41 -0700
I suggest that you do two things: 1. Read the extensive discussion of terrain interaction in general and HFTA in particular in the ARRL Antenna Book. 2. Generate some sample terrain plots see for you
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-04/msg00777.html (10,726 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] HFTA and diferent bands antennas (score: 1)
Author: hanslg@aol.com
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 08:22:06 -0400
Not necessarily. See below. The word "effective" is an important qualifier here. What HFTA does is attempt to model interaction of the wavefront with terrain. So it isn't the antenna pattern that's c
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-04/msg00818.html (9,736 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu