- 1. [TowerTalk] HTFA and Reality (score: 1)
- Author: "Kjeld Holm" <kh@kh-translation.dk>
- Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 11:02:21 +0100
- Gentlemen: I am using HFTA in planning for an array for 10 to 20 m. Due to zone restrictions I am modelling a lot of solutions - normal and crazy ones among each other. As I may end up being restrict
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00637.html (8,054 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TowerTalk] HTFA and Reality (score: 1)
- Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>
- Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 08:08:11 -0600
- HFTA gives incorrect gain for yagis stacked that close. The manual has a warning about yagis spaced closer than 1/2 wavelength. Jerry, K4SAV _______________________________________________ __________
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00638.html (9,042 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TowerTalk] HTFA and Reality (score: 1)
- Author: "Kjeld Holm" <kh@kh-translation.dk>
- Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 15:26:04 +0100
- Dear Pete (and others) Thanks for your quick and informative answers. I think I must go for a single Force 12 C3SS as high as possible. I cannot go for a bigger antenna as the perimeter of the rotati
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00639.html (8,748 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TowerTalk] HTFA and Reality (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
- Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 08:16:36 -0800
- I don't think HFTA models the interaction between antennas, rather, it assumes that they are idealized point source radiators with a specified elevation pattern and gain, and then just sums the contr
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00640.html (9,010 bytes)
- 5. Re: [TowerTalk] HTFA and Reality (score: 1)
- Author: K7LXC@aol.com
- Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 12:45:53 EST
- go for a bigger antenna as the perimeter of the rotating antenna (turning radius) will go too near my neighbours at a hight 26 feet. Going from C3SS to a longer boom (C31XR) will raise turning radius
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00646.html (7,590 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu