Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Half\s+Sloper\s+recommendations\s+\-\s+Results\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Half\s+Sloper\s+recommendations\s+\-\s+Results\!\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Half Sloper recommendations - Results! (score: 1): Author: RLVZ@aol.com; Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 12:57:06 EST; Hi Guys, Happy New Year! Thank You to 10 people who replied concerning my questions about installing a 160-meter "Half Sloper" or moving my Inv. L from my 90' tower (where it works poorly) over to my; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00019.html (11,852 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Half Sloper recommendations - Results! (score: 1): Author: "J. Gordon Beattie, Jr., W2TTT" <w2ttt@att.net>; Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2010 19:19:15 -0800; Dick, What brand and model are your 90 and 60 ft towers and how much concrete is under each one? Thanks & 73, Gordon Beattie, W2TTT 201.314.6964 __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, versi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00036.html (7,693 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Half Sloper recommendations - Results! (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2010 03:30:13 -0500; I have a half sloper on my 100' 45G. It comes off very close to the top. http://www.rogerhalstead.com/ham_files/Tower30.htm Although invisible in the photo it comes off the tower about 3' below the t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00038.html (15,712 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Half Sloper recommendations - Results! (score: 1): Author: Gary Slagel <gdslagel@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 07:42:26 -0800 (PST); Hi Roger, Is that also a Hi-tower vertical on the end of your garage? I wonder what you think of it compared to your half slopers? I'm trying to figure out a 80/160 antenna. Thanks for your inp; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00041.html (17,590 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] Half Sloper recommendations - Results! (score: 1): Author: Charles Bibb <zedkay@telepak.net>; Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2010 11:50:45 -0600; Guys, I have to chime in on this one. In many of the responses to the guy asking for advice about what 160M antenna to use with his 90-foot tower, I'm reading over and over snippets of "common knowle; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00046.html (11,769 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] Half Sloper recommendations - Results! (score: 1): Author: "W5LT" <W5LT@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2010 14:45:11 -0600; Dick: I know this is a late addition, but would like to add my experience with a 80/160m 'half' sloper. I have a aluminum fold-over tower that is 85ft tall, with a SteppIR 3 element with the 30/40m d; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00055.html (14,959 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] Half Sloper recommendations - Results! (score: 1): Author: "Chet" <chetmoore@cox.net>; Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 15:47:18 -0500; Charles, I don't doubt any of your findings. On the other hand I started with the inverted L on my 90 footer with a C31 on top and a cushcraft shorty 40 on a gate at 75 feet and went to shunt feeding; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00056.html (14,714 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] Half Sloper recommendations - Results! (score: 1): Author: "Chet" <chetmoore@cox.net>; Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 16:05:56 -0500; Charles, I don't doubt any of your findings. On the other hand I started with the inverted L on my 90 footer with a C31 on top and a cushcraft shorty 40 on a gate at 75 feet and went to shunt feeding; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00057.html (15,617 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]