Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Ham\s+Radio\s+a\s+la\s+NY\s+Times\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Ham\s+Radio\s+a\s+la\s+NY\s+Times\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Ham Radio a la NY Times (score: 1): Author: wa2moe@doitnow.com (Stu Greene); Date: Thu, 05 Mar 1998 10:30:22 -0700; excerpt quoted (thanks to AF2C) from an article about ham radio in the 5 March edition of the NY Times. So much for journalistic accuracy though, living on placid; -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contestin; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-03/msg00090.html (7,992 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Ham Radio a la NY Times (score: 1): Author: dave@egh.com (David Clemons); Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 15:09:59 -0500 (EST); Well, I am sure am glad this article came out. 4000 watts and a big hill, huh? Now I know how the High Power guys do so much better than us 100 watters in contests. I suppose this reflector won't be; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-03/msg00092.html (7,842 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Ham Radio a la NY Times (score: 1): Author: kg5u@hal-pc.org (Dale L. Martin); Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 17:06:18 -0600; Yessss....just think about the accuracy of all the other reportage that you DON'T have intimate knowledge of and how it must be similarly butchered. AND that was the highly 'respected' and venerable; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-03/msg00099.html (7,300 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Ham Radio a la NY Times (score: 1): Author: FSWF37A@prodigy.com ( JAMES T BRANNIGAN); Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 20:45:02, -0500; Considering how journalists screw up articles about Ham Radio...the NY Times article was well done and favorable to the hobby. except for the 4000 watt power limitation....gess they thot it was for t; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-03/msg00101.html (7,337 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] Ham Radio a la NY Times (score: 1): Author: W7NN@aol.com (W7NN); Date: Fri, 6 Mar 1998 08:50:58 EST; << p.s. I bet the Times gets as many letters from physicists and astronomers concerning the author's misunderstanding of the ionesphere as they get from amateur operators concerning his incorrect "fa; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-03/msg00108.html (7,549 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]