Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Happy\s+news\s+for\s+a\s+change\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Happy news for a change (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:19:45 -0400
Greetings TowerTalkians = Good news and bad news: The Good News... my city allows towers and antennas, and there are NO PERMITS and NO INSPECTIONS !! The Bad News is there is a limit of 55 feet. Fort
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-08/msg00271.html (7,265 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Happy news for a change (score: 1)
Author: Alan NV8A <nv8a@att.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 12:06:55 -0400
How is the ordinance worded? Park Township's (near Holland, MI -- but it's not the municipality in which I live) ordinance refers, I am told, to the height of the "tower." Thus some hams have argued
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-08/msg00274.html (8,765 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Happy news for a change (score: 1)
Author: Tom Anderson <andersonww5l@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 09:28:20 -0700 (PDT)
Alan: One thing you can do that a lot of friends of mine have done. This would be to put up the tower you have planned with whatever antenna on top you have or are planning on buying. Use this a whil
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-08/msg00277.html (11,066 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Happy news for a change (score: 1)
Author: "Russell Hill" <rustyhill@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 09:33:47 -0800
So what city and state is this? I may need ta MOOVE! 73, Rusty, na5tr _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-08/msg00279.html (9,326 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Happy news for a change (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Davis -Davis RF Co." <sdavis@davisrf.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 12:37:30 -0400
Richards, amazing......I'd "push"it one step further, " but you said 55 ft tower, I didn't see anything about mast restriction !!" HI, Steve K1PEK _______________________________________________ ____
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-08/msg00281.html (9,205 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Happy news for a change (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 09:46:59 -0700
That's all fine. But don't forget mother nature's restrictions -- the interaction of weather, your tower, how you install it, what you put on it, and the laws of physics. 73, Jim Brown K9YC _________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-08/msg00282.html (7,818 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Happy news for a change (score: 1)
Author: "Russell Hill" <rustyhill@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 10:05:35 -0800
I would be very reluctant to challenge a politically entity which allows a given tower height by putting up that height of tower, as we understand the meaning, with mast and antennas up higher. Why m
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-08/msg00284.html (9,243 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Happy news for a change (score: 1)
Author: Chris Wendling <cpwendling@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 10:51:27 -0700 (PDT)
Just curious as to why 55 ft was chosen.  Seems like 65ft (about 1 wavelength on 20m) which would allow a good low angle radiation pattern on 14Mhz, would be better for hams.  I wonder if they though
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-08/msg00286.html (9,594 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Happy news for a change (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Johnson" <n6kj.kelly@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:08:27 -0700
55 ft seems to be a common number all around the country. It's probably just like boilerplate zoning ordinances and boilerplate CC&Rs. Someone picked that number long ago and others just followed sui
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-08/msg00288.html (11,344 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Happy news for a change (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:19:56 -0400
I live in the very West end of Wyoming, Michigan, what they call the "panhandle." Looks like we are fairly close neighbors. Did you perhaps work the MS 200 Mile bike ride event or the Spring Lake rac
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-08/msg00289.html (11,866 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Happy news for a change (score: 1)
Author: BRENT BAUM <brentbaum5323@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 12:20:08 -0600
Good deal for K8JHR. The small Utah town I live in requires a permit for the tower foundation, everything else is unrestricted. Guess it helps to have a former ham in the building ordinance departmen
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-08/msg00290.html (12,249 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Happy news for a change (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:32:25 -0400
I LOVE THE CAROLAN BELL STORY !!! I told neighbors my smaller loop antennas are "bat deflectors" that interfere with the bats' internal radar and keep them out of the yard. What you describe is calle
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-08/msg00292.html (9,126 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] Happy news for a change (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:21:40 -0400
Interesting points all around, But consider this TowerTalkians as you ponder what I might do: The up side of all this is that I am good friends with the City Prosecuting Attorney (criminal side) and
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-08/msg00293.html (10,153 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] Happy news for a change (score: 1)
Author: "Kenneth D. Grimm, K4XL" <grimm@sbc.edu>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:56:21 -0400
This is a no-brainer. Move to Virginia where we have one of the best antenna laws in the country. In a nutshell, antennas and towers are permitted by right. Limited to 75 or 200 ft, depending on whet
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-08/msg00294.html (11,203 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] Happy news for a change (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 17:00:08 -0400
It all depends on where you live and how they interpret the ordinance. If the inspector says the antenna is the structure then it doesn't matter if it's on a mast of what ever. That's the height limi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-08/msg00296.html (10,613 bytes)

16. Re: [TowerTalk] Happy news for a change (score: 1)
Author: "Bruce Jungwirth" <k0son@frontiernet.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 21:15:04 -0500
As a Ham Radio Operator, I wrote the Tower Ordinance here in Scandia, MN. in 1998 ( then a Township, now a City). What they had then was a re-write of Washington County's ordinance. What a joke that
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-08/msg00305.html (15,259 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu