Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Height\s+for\s+horizontal\s+loops\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Height\s+for\s+horizontal\s+loops\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] Height for horizontal loops (score: 1): Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>; Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:07:02 -0700 (PDT); Why would a horizontal loop EVER be better than a dipole at the same height? Also, height is relative to wavelength. 25 or 30 feet is OK on 10 meters, but practically scraping the ground on 160 meter; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-09/msg00421.html (7,508 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Height for horizontal loops (score: 1): Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>; Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:25:19 -0700; There are so many variables influencing the answer to your question that it seems to me your best bet is to download the demo version of EZNEC and learn how to use it. Your first surprise will be tha; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-09/msg00428.html (8,295 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Height for horizontal loops (score: 1): Author: Tim Kass <timkass@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:59:06 -0400; I agree with Dave, but a brief would be to put it about a 1/4 wave up at the operating freq. however, lower versions are cloud burners and good for 100 - 500 miles...higher is generally accepted as b; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-09/msg00429.html (10,571 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Height for horizontal loops (score: 1): Author: Dennis OConnor <ad4hk2004@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 05:40:52 -0700 (PDT); A skyloop can be a good compromise, all band, antenna solution for lots of folks... I had a coax fed, horizontal loop cut for 40 meters at 18 feet above ground, primarily for a listening antenna and; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-09/msg00437.html (7,231 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] Height For Horizontal Loops (score: 1): Author: "Thomas F. Giella NZ4O" <nz4o@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 09:20:38 -0400; Dave in my personal experience the length of the loop determines the TOA of the RF as much as height above ground. I use an 80 meter full wave loop (288 feet) for 80-10 meter operation. It's fed with; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-09/msg00439.html (9,745 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] Height for horizontal loops (score: 1): Author: "F.R. Ashley" <gdadx2@clearwire.net>; Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:41:31 -0400; I had a full wave 80-meter delta loop at 55 feet and it was one of the best wire antennas I've ever used. At first, I used a stub and used it for 80 meters only, then switched to open wire and used i; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-09/msg00459.html (8,573 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] Height for horizontal loops (score: 1): Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 18:43:54 -0500; My experience with the horizontal loop has led me to conclude that it is a good antenna on its one wavelength band and 2 and maybe even 4 w/l, provided the loop geometry is achieved, i.e. 3 or 4 or m; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-09/msg00464.html (11,428 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]