Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Heights\s+Towers\s+Aluminum\?\?\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Heights Towers Aluminum?? (score: 1)
Author: "Dennis Petrich" <radioart@charter.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 20:46:23 -0500
Hello all who have aluminum towers. I am thinking of putting up the tilt-over self supporting aluminum tower from Heights Towers. This one is 69' with the tilt-over kit and is rated at 21sq' at 80mph
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-08/msg00254.html (8,479 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] Heights Towers Aluminum?? (score: 1)
Author: W3OA <w3oa@roadrunner.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 21:42:33 -0400
Hi Dennis - I have a 60' Heights tower with a fold-over kit and 10 feet of mast out the top. It's been up for 5 years now and I'm very happy with it. You do need to watch how big an antenna you put o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-08/msg00322.html (9,001 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Heights Towers Aluminum?? (score: 1)
Author: Dennis <radioart@charter.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 05:11:45 -0800
Thanks for taking the time to respond Dick. Very good input on some of the issues I would be faced with. How do you rotate the antenna at 40' or is it stationaly? Isn't there some kind of ring assemb
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-08/msg00323.html (9,999 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Heights Towers Aluminum?? (score: 1)
Author: <donovanf@starpower.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 10:11:15 -0400 (EDT)
Don't forget that you must comply with the dead weight capacity of your tilt-over tower. This is important, a nearby ham failed to comply with the dead weight specification and his Heights fold-over
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-08/msg00324.html (11,908 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Heights Towers Aluminum?? (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 09:01:29 -0700
Frank brings up the major fallacy in the lightweight aluminum tower foldover paradigm. To really utilize the light weight of the aluminum to advantage, you need to use a Hazer system like on the Glen
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-08/msg00325.html (8,614 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Heights Towers Aluminum?? (score: 1)
Author: Dennis <radioart@charter.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 10:46:57 -0700
Thanks Frank for the dead weight reminder... _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lis
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-08/msg00326.html (13,490 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Heights Towers Aluminum?? (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Williams" <k8ztt@mho.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:40:33 -0600
I have seen several interesting comments on the reflector concerning Heights Alum towers; and in fact, I posted a couple myself. As I mentioned in a previous post, I have three of them and they all t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-08/msg00329.html (8,800 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Heights Towers Aluminum?? (score: 1)
Author: "W5LT" <W5LT@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 18:33:10 -0500
There must have been more at work here than the marginal addition of some Heliax. I designed the fold-over mechanism for the Heights new tower series a few years ago, in accordance with the Aluminum
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-08/msg00331.html (15,462 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Heights Towers Aluminum?? (score: 1)
Author: "Dennis Petrich" <radioart@charter.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 19:08:21 -0500
Thanks Bob for taking the time to set us straight. This info is timely because I'm interested in purchasing one of the HT soon. Regrads, Dennis, k0eoo _______________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-08/msg00333.html (18,238 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Heights Towers Aluminum?? (score: 1)
Author: <donovanf@starpower.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 21:13:34 -0400 (EDT)
Hi Dick, Unlike K3CB's recent experiences with the catastrophic failure ofboth of his Heights crank-up towers (one in dead calm weather and the other in light 30 MPH winds), the collapse of the Heigh
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-08/msg00335.html (10,708 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Heights Towers Aluminum?? (score: 1)
Author: k8isk@comcast.net
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 05:59:52 +0000
Hi all, As being the lucky person to clean up the mess left by Owen's tower failures, I can tell you first hand that all antenna weights, wind load specs, lengths, etc. were passed on to Heights befo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-08/msg00338.html (13,918 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Heights Towers Aluminum?? (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 04:21:25 -0400
I hope I can properly phrase this and although experienced I'm certainly no expert either and it has been a while. There are some differences, but the appearance of a good weld and failure is pretty
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-08/msg00339.html (14,342 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] Heights Towers Aluminum?? (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Kellow" <RSKellow@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 19:24:43 -0500
Correction to my math: 700 lbs x 8 ft = 5600 ft-lbs; but you get the idea. Thanks for the nice comments off-line. Bob, W5LT There must have been more at work here than the marginal addition of some H
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-08/msg00340.html (16,310 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] Heights Towers Aluminum?? (score: 1)
Author: "Mark - AA6DX" <AA6DX@ARRL.NET>
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 17:46:25 -0700
I was visiting my old buddies, Harbor Frieight, a couple weeks ago ... they had on special an aluminum welding rod that advertised you only needed a propane torch to make a super aluminum connection
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-08/msg00382.html (11,230 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu