Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Help\s+needed\s+on\s+new\s+beam\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Help needed on new beam (score: 1)
Author: r young <ryoung158@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2019 14:57:57 -0500
My KT34a is acting up and I should probably replace it. My tower is only an MA40 and cannot handle much, plus I want something that is not too conspicuous. A 2 element Steppir may be good for me but
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-01/msg00040.html (7,478 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Help needed on new beam (score: 1)
Author: Art Greenberg <art@artg.tv>
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2019 15:45:10 -0500
Gerry, I have a new, unassembled KT34 in its original (if somewhat ragged) carton. I also have all of the parts from M2 to make it just like the version they sell. I bought all that a while ago, the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-01/msg00041.html (8,171 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Help needed on new beam (score: 1)
Author: Art Greenberg <art@artg.tv>
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2019 15:57:38 -0500
To be clear, this antenna was never assembled. -- Art Greenberg WA2LLN art@artg.tv _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing li
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-01/msg00042.html (9,961 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Help needed on new beam (score: 1)
Author: Michael Murphy <mike@ki8r.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2019 16:19:09 -0500
The Navassa 5 really isn't that big. Probably has a smaller footprint that a KT34a. And with full size elements may perform at least as well if not better. Stay away from trap antennas whenever possi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-01/msg00043.html (9,060 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Help needed on new beam (score: 1)
Author: Mike Ricketts <mike.nd9g@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2019 15:50:57 -0600
If you want to see what the Navassa-5 looks like up "not that high" take a look at my QRZ page. Mine is installed at 51 feet, right next to the house. It also has the JK401 3 feet above it. However,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-01/msg00044.html (10,519 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Help needed on new beam (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2019 15:08:05 -0800
My tower is only an MA40 and cannot handle much, plus I want something that is not too conspicuous. A 2 element Steppir may be good for me but it seems they require more maintenance than I can do. I
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-01/msg00045.html (7,846 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Help needed on new beam (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2019 18:11:29 -0800
My 3-el straight Steppir (no trombones) has been trouble-free since neighbor K6XX put it on my 120 ft tower ten years ago.  I've been VERY pleased with performance, and would make the same decision a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-01/msg00046.html (8,218 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Help needed on new beam (score: 1)
Author: Jim <jimw7ry@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2019 22:43:48 -0600
I attempted to rebuild a KT34 XA with the new kit supplied by M2.  The kit was older, but new in the box. I never could get it to work or the SWR to be halfway reasonable. I sold it as parts/not work
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-01/msg00047.html (8,989 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Help needed on new beam (score: 1)
Author: Jim <jimw7ry@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2019 22:46:12 -0600
If traps were as lossy and you think, why don't they just smoke and burn up when on RTTY at 1500 watts? Get your calculator out, and if they really are that lossy, would they would catch fire dissipa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-01/msg00048.html (9,513 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Help needed on new beam (score: 1)
Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2019 07:25:55 -0500
I remember seeing a burnt TH7 trap on the wall of the P49V/P40YL shack with a note that said this is what happens when you run more than 500 watts on RTTY. Of course there may have been a salt buildu
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-01/msg00049.html (8,511 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Help needed on new beam (score: 1)
Author: Jim <jimw7ry@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2019 09:08:47 -0600
I ran 1500 watts to a TH7 in southwest Washington for 15 years in RTTY contests. It finally blew up after 15 years. Most likely water or bugs in the 15 meter trap. Took it down and moved to Missouri
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-01/msg00050.html (9,819 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Help needed on new beam (score: 1)
Author: k7lxc--- via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2019 17:17:42 +0000 (UTC)
    So how is it "acting up"? What symptoms does it have? It's a decent antenna so it might be worth repairing. Cheers,Steve    K7LXCTOWER TECH _______________________________________________ ______
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-01/msg00052.html (8,828 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] Help needed on new beam (score: 1)
Author: k7lxc--- via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2019 17:22:20 +0000 (UTC)
    If you're considering a new antenna, I'd suggest the K4RIO (I think that's his call) Hex Beam. Almost negligible windload and works great. CheersSteve     K7LXCTOWER TECH  _______________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-01/msg00053.html (8,220 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] Help needed on new beam (score: 1)
Author: r young <ryoung158@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2019 14:12:23 -0500
Thanks Mike I am very footprint conscious in this location but I know it is a great antenna. The KT34a elements ahve a lot of space between them looking OK.. Maybe Navassa would not look worse 73 ger
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-01/msg00054.html (10,745 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] Help needed on new beam (score: 1)
Author: Patrick Greenlee <patrick_g@windstream.net>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2019 15:19:58 -0600
K4KIO _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk __________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-01/msg00055.html (8,482 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu