Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Help\s+with\s+PE\s+certification\s+of\s+tower\s+in\s+NJ\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Help with PE certification of tower in NJ (score: 1)
Author: "Bob A. Booey" <rentwist@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 18:57:48 -0500
Hello Tower Gurus, I have installed a 55 foot Rohn 25 antenna tower on my property, secured to the side of the house under the eve with a HBUTVRO (HD house bracket) at 21 feet and guyed with Phillyst
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00563.html (8,500 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Help with PE certification of tower in NJ (score: 1)
Author: "Hank Lonberg" <kr7x@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 21:33:15 -0800
Bob: First off I am a licensed P.E. in New Jersey among other states. The IBC 2000 or even 2003 does not mention that a tower that is 30' or less above a roof is ok. It does not mention towers in any
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00566.html (10,865 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Help with PE certification of tower in NJ (score: 1)
Author: "Hank Lonberg" <kr7x@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 09:08:28 -0800
Bob: Well I bet that they want a letter and calculations to back up the statement of load capacity. 110 mph is not unusual near the coast. This is the IBC wind velocity which is a 3-sec gust value. D
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00572.html (17,081 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Help with PE certification of tower in NJ (score: 1)
Author: "J. Gordon Beattie, Jr." <w2ttt@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 20:20:23 -0500
Hi Folks! This exchange has me thinking. When 8 foot, C-band dishes started popping up on homes, there were mounts that did not have drilled and bolted bases. I'm wondering if they make sense, or if
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00593.html (19,154 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu