Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Hi\-Z\s+Antenna\s+Stuff\s*$/: 26 ]

Total 26 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Hi-Z Antenna Stuff (score: 1)
Author: "Wilson Lamb" <infomet@embarqmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 12:04:41 -0500
It's disappointing to see hams doing this to each other. It's darn hard to see what's patentable in that schematic...tuned circuits, diode limiters, and buffer amps, wow, hi tech!! ALL the math is de
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-02/msg00161.html (7,910 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Hi-Z Antenna Stuff (score: 1)
Author: Mirko S57AD <miroslav.sibilja@amis.net>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 18:12:23 +0100
Can't agree more with Wilson! 73 Mirko, S57AD _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://li
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-02/msg00162.html (8,424 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Hi-Z Antenna Stuff (score: 1)
Author: Wayne Kline <w3ea@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 12:21:04 -0500
I was told a loooooong time ago.. " Follow the $$$$$ Wayne W3EA _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contes
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-02/msg00163.html (9,406 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Hi-Z Antenna Stuff (score: 1)
Author: Jack/W6NF <vhfplus@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 09:33:31 -0800
That's my question... What the hell did Rausch patent that was so unique and different that a patent was possible? Or can you patent something whereby everything is well known but you hold you head j
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-02/msg00165.html (8,218 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Hi-Z Antenna Stuff (score: 1)
Author: "Mike & Becca Krzystyniak" <k9mk@flash.net>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 11:33:46 -0600
For many of the same reasons I agree with Wilson too. But obviously the examiners saw something in the claims that they approved of (the so called flux capacitor). Out of curiosity I did a patent sea
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-02/msg00166.html (11,887 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Hi-Z Antenna Stuff (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 10:01:27 -0800
Yes, and it has caused me to avoid doing business with DXE when there are other good choices. I've done enough business with DXE that I've got a half dozen or so hats and a clock, but when I needed
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-02/msg00167.html (8,396 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Hi-Z Antenna Stuff (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 12:04:33 -0700
Anyone who thinks the people in the U.S. Patent Office that review patent submissions are knowledgeable enough to make the judgments they do hasn't had much experience with them. I'm sure they do the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-02/msg00169.html (9,729 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Hi-Z Antenna Stuff (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:20:27 -0500
Reexam means the patent is being reviewed again to see if it was valid - specifically if the material covered was truly "novel." Whether the device/process in question was covered by other patents,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-02/msg00171.html (15,539 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Hi-Z Antenna Stuff (score: 1)
Author: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:26:37 -0500
Apparently the government, at least MITRE, has been building frequency-independent directional phased arrays for quite a while now, with voltage probe antennas, an amp at each antenna and coax delay
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-02/msg00174.html (8,478 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Hi-Z Antenna Stuff (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 12:24:00 -0800
I don't know what the problem with patenting and making money from your inventive efforts is. You can patent something and give the world a license to use it, if you like. Or you can try to keep your
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-02/msg00176.html (9,892 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Hi-Z Antenna Stuff (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 12:27:53 -0800
In advance of actually reading the claims (probably do that tonight), I think it's quite likely that the claims cover more details of the design of the amplifier than phased arrays. Sure, there will
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-02/msg00177.html (10,308 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Hi-Z Antenna Stuff (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 12:29:17 -0800
Why, yes, that is EXACTLY what patents are for. You take things that are ordinary and commonplace and combine them in a new and novel way to produce something of use. How it is produced could also be
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-02/msg00178.html (8,668 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] Hi-Z Antenna Stuff (score: 1)
Author: Jack/W6NF <vhfplus@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:06:12 -0800
Okay...if the technical aspects of a product is well-known, and not patentable in and of itself, then only the specifics of production and packaging are part of the protection of the patent. I've hea
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-02/msg00181.html (10,285 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] Hi-Z Antenna Stuff (score: 1)
Author: Art Trampler <atrampler@att.net>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 14:19:39 -0800 (PST)
I expect this thread is going to receive a, "Can we get back to towers" reminder soon enough (and I have no beef with that), but in considering patents in general, remember that companies are success
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-02/msg00182.html (11,391 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] Hi-Z Antenna Stuff (score: 1)
Author: "Mike & Becca Krzystyniak" <k9mk@flash.net>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 16:45:14 -0600
I'm guessing most companies do not bother to patent novel manufacturing methods or process related inovation as that stuff is usually rather narrow in nature. The know the company I worked for kept i
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-02/msg00183.html (10,979 bytes)

16. Re: [TowerTalk] Hi-Z Antenna Stuff (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:58:20 -0800
That's only one kind of patent (a method patent). You can also have a patent on the arrangement and function of the pieces. That's the usual kind of patent. And also (although weaker) a "design paten
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-02/msg00184.html (10,091 bytes)

17. Re: [TowerTalk] Hi-Z Antenna Stuff (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Schaaf" <dan-schaaf@att.net>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 18:04:27 -0500
As I understand, the patent is on the buffer. Best Regards Dan Schaaf K3ZXL www.k3zxl.com 60 Meters www.60metersonline.net NOBSKA www.nobska.net Cape Cod Instruments www.gnm-inc.com Tel: 941-766-0706
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-02/msg00185.html (11,356 bytes)

18. Re: [TowerTalk] Hi-Z antenna stuff (score: 1)
Author: jcjacobsen@q.com
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 19:39:32 -0500 (EST)
Yo, A somewhat interesting thread but maybe everyone is missing the obvious. MAYBE, just MAYBE, the patent covers the use of a 'wench' in the design. Or maybe a North facing plastic owl (SORRY!! I co
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-02/msg00186.html (8,141 bytes)

19. Re: [TowerTalk] Hi-Z antenna stuff (score: 1)
Author: Wayne Kline <w3ea@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 20:26:28 -0500
You tell'em Jake.. my only burning question is to face the Owl ? Magnetic North or True North? and how can I tell the difference ; / Wayne W3EA _______________________________________________ _______
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-02/msg00187.html (9,262 bytes)

20. Re: [TowerTalk] Hi-Z antenna stuff (score: 1)
Author: "Chet moore" <chetmoore@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 21:20:55 -0500
To get the owl pointed correctly you need to line it up the shadow of wench (supported on a string) at high noon. You tell'em Jake.. my only burning question is to face the Owl ? Magnetic North or Tr
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-02/msg00188.html (10,264 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu