Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+High\s+Power\s+\/\s+Low\s+Power\s+\?\s+\/\s+better\s+antenna\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] High Power / Low Power ? / better antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Randy Molyneaux (ve5 rjm)" <ve5rjm@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 19:12:27 -0600
I was curiously seeking info on a new repeater and came across many sites, and formulas and one in choosing the best overall system for the cost. What would it be..... Let's say in choosing equipment
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00203.html (8,119 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] High Power / Low Power ? / better antenna (score: 1)
Author: "D. Scott MacKenzie" <kb0fhp@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 20:21:37 -0500
As I recall - every 3 db is a doubling of power - SO: 50 watts into 11 dbd antenna - 630 watts 100 watts into 8 dbd antenna - 631 watts... OK - they are about equal...now what about maintenance, cost
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00205.html (9,599 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] High Power / Low Power ? / better antenna (score: 1)
Author: N7KA@comcast.net
Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2007 01:56:11 +0000
One consideration often forgotten in the dB arguement is the benefit on the RECEIVE side as well. I would rather have 100W into a 3el yagi than 1000W into a dipole in most cases. Then there is the an
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00210.html (10,748 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] High Power / Low Power ? / better antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 21:10:45 -0500
You didn't say what band the repeater would operate in? With 145 feet of cable I would assume that the antenna would be something less than that in height above ground? The higher gain antenna will g
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00211.html (9,924 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] High Power / Low Power ? / better antenna (score: 1)
Author: "K8RI on TowerTalk" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 22:01:40 -0500
Reading this I'm assume that you are talking about a repeater installation and not an installation for working the repeater. I'm basing that on the remark that the area is fairly flat over a 60 mile
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00212.html (10,481 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] High Power / Low Power ? / better antenna (score: 1)
Author: "WA3GIN" <wa3gin@erols.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 22:26:14 -0500
1st get a coordinated freq. pair then go for the most gain antenna with a good notch filter to keep the pager systems out of your input freq., with the most power amp with the least lost coax, top no
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00214.html (9,916 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] High Power / Low Power ? / better antenna (score: 1)
Author: ersmar@comcast.net
Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2007 04:30:19 +0000
Randy: That extra 3 dB of gain from the 8 bay dipole array works on receive, too. FWIW. 73 de Gene Smar AD3F _______________________________________________ __________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00217.html (9,718 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] High Power / Low Power ? / better antenna (score: 1)
Author: Joe <k1jcnh@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 12:50:20 -0500
Try the repeater builder group on Yahoo. repeater-builder@yahoogroups.com. Joe _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list T
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00240.html (11,133 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu