Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Horizontal\s+Pol\s+Quad\;\s+Square\s+or\s+Diamond\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Horizontal\s+Pol\s+Quad\;\s+Square\s+or\s+Diamond\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Horizontal Pol Quad; Square or Diamond? (score: 1): Author: Dino Darling <k6rix@earthlink.net>; Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 23:01:05 -0700; If we feed a quad antenna from the bottom, we end up with a horizontal polarized antenna. My question is about the support structure or the arrangement of the wire. Is a BOX (x-frame) better or worse; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-06/msg00439.html (7,365 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Horizontal Pol Quad; Square or Diamond? (score: 1): Author: "Mark Holzbach" <fasis@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 09:15:46 -0400; I have modeled both configurations and there is very little difference using 4 element models. I have built and used both configurations and have been happy with their performance. Physical durabilit; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-06/msg00448.html (8,373 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]