Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Horizontal\s+vs\.\s+Vertical\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Horizontal\s+vs\.\s+Vertical\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Horizontal vs. Vertical (score: 1): Author: k0ha@navix.net (Bill Hohnstein); Date: Sun, 10 May 1998 21:17:14 -0700; Part of it is that; plus a poor ground system common to high band vertical users. I had a 13 element parasitic vertical array (5 directors; 7 reflectors arranged in a parabolic fashion) for 20 meters; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-05/msg00325.html (10,000 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Horizontal vs. Vertical (score: 1): Author: n4gi@juno.com (Blake M Meinecke); Date: Mon, 11 May 1998 00:48:42 EDT; The thread on verticals brought to mind a few questions. I knew a ham who placed metal rock-lathe chicken wire-ish stuff down in his whole yard (city lot in neighborhood) before laying sod. Pieces we; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-05/msg00329.html (9,494 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Horizontal vs. Vertical (score: 1): Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon); Date: Mon, 11 May 1998 07:14:53 -0500; Probably not worth the effort, IMHO. Better to do radials, elevated or buried. Even if you covered your whole property with solid copper sheet and drilled drain holes, if the ground conductivity is l; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-05/msg00333.html (9,683 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]