Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Hose\s+Clamps\s+Compared\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Hose\s+Clamps\s+Compared\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Hose Clamps Compared (score: 1): Author: Drew Vonada-Smith <drew@whisperingwoods.org>; Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2022 16:19:16 +0000; Ouch. I think I bought a tomato slicer from that guy once. I've had better luck with the T-bar style clamps in the tougher applications. But on my 80M 4SQ, which needed repairs every year, I gave up; /archives//html/Towertalk/2022-08/msg00012.html (7,675 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Hose Clamps Compared (score: 1): Author: john simmons <jasimmons@pinewooddata.com>; Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2022 17:17:25 +0000; And yet a popular and old design 21 commercial antenna is successfully held together with one worm drive hose clamp _______________________________________________ ___________________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2022-08/msg00013.html (8,991 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Hose Clamps Compared (score: 1): Author: Jim W7RY <jimw7ry@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2022 14:39:47 -0500; Which one is that? Jim, w7ry _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.co; /archives//html/Towertalk/2022-08/msg00017.html (9,929 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Hose Clamps Compared (score: 1): Author: John Simmons <jasimmons@pinewooddata.com>; Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2022 18:18:07 -0500; The venerable DB224 -- 73, -de John NI0K rural Debs, MN https://www.qrz.com/db/ni0k Jim W7RY wrote on 8/8/2022 2:39 PM: Which one is that? Jim, w7ry And yet a popular and old design 21 commercial ant; /archives//html/Towertalk/2022-08/msg00021.html (11,351 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] Hose Clamps Compared (score: 1): Author: Jeff Blaine <KeepWalking188@ac0c.com>; Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2022 21:28:03 -0500; Apples and oranges. Hose clamps work fine with HORIZONTAL elements. The slightest compression is adequate to contain most movement. But the issue K3PA mentions is with a vertical 4SQ. That is a com; /archives//html/Towertalk/2022-08/msg00024.html (10,397 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] Hose Clamps Compared (score: 1): Author: Jeff Blaine <KeepWalking188@ac0c.com>; Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 12:57:51 -0500; I could not remember what a DB224 was. Looked it up and was laughing to see the hose clamp on that antenna. The funny part is that in the current version, they have doubled up on the hose clamps -; /archives//html/Towertalk/2022-08/msg00041.html (12,466 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] Hose Clamps Compared (score: 1): Author: Jim W7RY <jimw7ry@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 13:04:52 -0500; What you failed to mention is that gravity is what really holds the DB-224 together. The two sections slide inside of one another. Exactly the same as a Rohn tower section. The hose clamps are to si; /archives//html/Towertalk/2022-08/msg00044.html (12,068 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] Hose Clamps Compared (score: 1): Author: Jim W7RY <jimw7ry@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 13:06:16 -0500; There have always been two of them on the antennas I've installed the last 40+ years. 73, Jim W7RY No doubt they added a 2nd hose clamp because the first one was ultimately inadequate to the task. 73; /archives//html/Towertalk/2022-08/msg00045.html (13,312 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] Hose Clamps Compared (score: 1): Author: Jim W7RY <jimw7ry@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 18:51:21 -0500; What you failed to mention is that gravity is what really holds the DB-224 together. The two sections slide inside of one another. Exactly the same as a Rohn tower section. The hose clamps are to si; /archives//html/Towertalk/2022-08/msg00056.html (12,391 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]