Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+How\s+High\s+is\s+enough\.\.\.$HFTA$\s+now\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+How\s+High\s+is\s+enough\.\.\.$HFTA$\s+now\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] How High is enough...(HFTA) now (score: 1): Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com; Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 21:31:30 -0400 (EDT); Although the numbers are over an 11 year range, they do provide an average. I'm a firm believer in playing the averages, since over the WHOLE course of the cycle you will do best designing your stati; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-07/msg00584.html (7,635 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] How High is enough...(HFTA) now (score: 1): Author: john@kk9a.com; Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 09:15:50 -0400; A lot can be done with two tribanders. Besides changing the radiation angle you can also beam in two directions which is very useful if you contest. I had BOP capabilities with my 40m beams. I though; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-08/msg00001.html (8,153 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] How High is enough...(HFTA) now (score: 1): Author: David Robbins <k1ttt@verizon.net>; Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 08:41:43 -0500 (CDT); I tried BIP/BOP on 10m and saw no advantage to it... but stacking antennas at 30'/60'/90'/120' with various combinations and single antennas available is definitely an advantage A lot can be done wit; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-08/msg00002.html (8,396 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] How High is enough...(HFTA) now (score: 1): Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com; Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 10:09:24 -0400 (EDT); It's amazing how different results can be at different stations. W4ZV says the same thing...no difference. However, at four different stations I've had, BIP/BOP makes a difference. Sometimes BIP and; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-08/msg00003.html (9,384 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]