Results:
References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+How\s+does\s+the\s+DX\s+engineering\s+4Sq\s+phasing\s+box\s+compare\?\s*$/: 9 ]
Total 9 documents matching your query.
- 1. Re: [TowerTalk] How does the DX engineering 4Sq phasing box compare? (score: 1)
- Author: Tim Duffy K3LR <k3lr@k3lr.com>
- Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2007 19:11:31 -0400
- Hello Rick! I don't understand the your statement, "The Array Solutions is the box that does things right". The Comtek box certainly does what it was supposed to do. I've measured its performance on
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00249.html (16,234 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TowerTalk] How does the DX engineering 4Sq phasing box compare? (score: 1)
- Author: "Mark Robinson" <markrob@mindspring.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 18:13:29 -0400
- Yes the Array solutions box is a adjustable and doesn't rely on phasing lines. Then there is the DX Engineering 4 square receiving array Mark N1UK G3ZZM -- Original Message -- From: "Rick Karlquist"
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00244.html (15,775 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TowerTalk] How does the DX engineering 4Sq phasing box compare? (score: 1)
- Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 14:56:31 -0700 (PDT)
- I was confused too. The array solutions is the box that does things "right". Rick N6RK _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailin
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00238.html (14,469 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TowerTalk] How does the DX engineering 4Sq phasing box compare? (score: 1)
- Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 17:48:25 -0400
- Thanks Tim and others. I may have a chance to pick up a DX Eng of Oregon used for less than half of a new Comtek. That would be less than my time spent on building one. Speaking of building, is there
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00237.html (13,663 bytes)
- 5. Re: [TowerTalk] How does the DX engineering 4Sq phasing box compare? (score: 1)
- Author: "Mark Robinson" <markrob@mindspring.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 17:09:13 -0400
- Yes I was getting confused. I was thinking of the Array Solutions 4 Square tx controller compared to the Comtek box http://www.arraysolutions.com/Products/foursquare.htm Mark N1UK G3ZZM -- Original M
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00235.html (13,437 bytes)
- 6. Re: [TowerTalk] How does the DX engineering 4Sq phasing box compare? (score: 1)
- Author: Tim Duffy K3LR <k3lr@k3lr.com>
- Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2007 16:56:49 -0400
- I think there is some confusion going on here. There are two versions of DX Engineering boxes that I am aware of. The 1st was a copy of the Comtek box. Built by the former DX Engineering company in O
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00232.html (11,890 bytes)
- 7. Re: [TowerTalk] How does the DX engineering 4Sq phasing box compare? (score: 1)
- Author: "Mark Robinson" <markrob@mindspring.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 15:50:53 -0400
- Agreed but I have worked quite a few stations on 80m who were using the Comtek box and they had good directional characteristics from their arrays. If you have a nice flat location then the Comtek bo
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00231.html (9,265 bytes)
- 8. Re: [TowerTalk] How does the DX engineering 4Sq phasing box compare? (score: 1)
- Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 12:35:51 -0700 (PDT)
- IMHO, the DXE is the first box to do it the "right" way. It is also fairly expensive. I don't own any of these, but the DXE is similar to stuff I have homebrewed that worked well. It looks like a goo
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00229.html (8,523 bytes)
- 9. [TowerTalk] How does the DX engineering 4Sq phasing box compare? (score: 1)
- Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 15:22:20 -0400
- Im considering going to a 4sq for 80M and possibly 160 and wonder how the DX Engr compares to Comtek and others? Carl KM1H _______________________________________________ ____________________________
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00225.html (7,429 bytes)
Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by
Namazu