Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+How\s+flexible\s+is\s+standard\s+LMR\-400\s+\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+How\s+flexible\s+is\s+standard\s+LMR\-400\s+\?\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] How flexible is standard LMR-400 ?? (score: 1): Author: Dan Bookwalter <n8dcj@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 08:29:43 -0700 (PDT); __________________________________ Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Suppor; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-09/msg00522.html (7,521 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] How flexible is standard LMR-400 ?? (score: 1): Author: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 10:40:07 -0500; I have found the "comfortable" bending radius is about 1.5 feet (3 foot loop), but you could get a loop quite a bit tighter without distorting the center conductor. I treat it similar to 1/2 inch har; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-09/msg00523.html (8,117 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] How flexible is standard LMR-400 ?? (score: 1): Author: "Al Williams" <alwilliams@olywa.net>; Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 08:58:36 -0700; Can standard LMR400 be used for the rotator to tower loop which has repeated bending or should flexible LMR400 be used? k7puc _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomput; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-09/msg00524.html (8,542 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] How flexible is standard LMR-400 ?? (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com; Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 12:13:01 EDT; loop), but you could get a loop quite a bit tighter without distorting the center conductor. I treat it similar to 1/2 inch hardline. The most common spec I've seen is the minimum bending radius is s; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-09/msg00525.html (8,346 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] How flexible is standard LMR-400 ?? (score: 1): Author: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 11:21:02 -0500; I would not do it. I would use 213 or 9913F7. 73, Keith NM5G Can standard LMR400 be used for the rotator to tower loop which has repeated bending or should flexible LMR400 be used? k7puc ____________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-09/msg00526.html (8,893 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] How flexible is standard LMR-400 ?? (score: 1): Author: "Alan NV8A (ex. AB2OS)" <nv8a@att.net>; Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 12:25:16 -0400; I don't *think* regular LMR400 is flexible enough for the rotator-to-tower loop. But I would be inclined to use Davis RF's Bury-Flex in place of LMR400UF: it's cheaper even than regular LMR400 and ha; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-09/msg00527.html (9,269 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] How flexible is standard LMR-400 ?? (score: 1): Author: "K8RI on Tower talk" <k8ri-tower@charter.net>; Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 15:00:52 -0400; I like to make a distinction between bending radius (which can take a set) and flexing radius (which does not) I believe the minimum bending radius for LMR 400 is only 1 1/2 inches, not something you; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-09/msg00531.html (11,413 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] How flexible is standard LMR-400 ?? (score: 1): Author: W0UN -- John Brosnahan <shr@swtexas.net>; Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 14:29:24 -0500; It is my understanding that the bending radius quoted in the spec is the tightest you can bend it in a permanent installation and the tightest you can put it on a reel. There are two issues here (at; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-09/msg00532.html (9,707 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]