Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+ICE\s+419A\s+Combination\s+Bandpass\s+Filter\s+10M\s+Section\s+Blown\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+ICE\s+419A\s+Combination\s+Bandpass\s+Filter\s+10M\s+Section\s+Blown\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] ICE 419A Combination Bandpass Filter 10M Section Blown (score: 1): Author: "Keith Dutson" <kjdutson@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 13:39:57 -0600; Subject says it all. VSWR went to 5 at some point during operation of VP8WWW. The filter box was set to 10 meters and connected to a trapped vertical and Kenwood 480HX. Transceiver was set to 200 wat; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-12/msg00239.html (7,680 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] ICE 419A Combination Bandpass Filter 10M Section Blown (score: 1): Author: "David Hachadorian" <K6LL@adelphia.net>; Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 14:20:13 -0700; -- Original Message -- From: "Keith Dutson" <kjdutson@earthlink.net> To: "TowerTalk" <towertalk@contesting.com> Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 12:39 PM Subject: [TowerTalk] ICE 419A Combination Band; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-12/msg00240.html (11,066 bytes)
3. RE: [TowerTalk] ICE 419A Combination Bandpass Filter 10M Section Blown (score: 1): Author: "Keith Dutson" <kjdutson@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 15:58:05 -0600; Thanks for all of the responses. I ended up contacting Jay Terleski at Array Solutions where the boxes were purchased. He referred me to Mike at ICE. Mike is shipping replacement caps so I can do the; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-12/msg00243.html (10,004 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] ICE 419A Combination Bandpass Filter 10M Section Blown (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 17:29:31 -0500; and two caps in T have a schematic. I be done with higher It can also be a current problem. You really should look at component ratings and the actual current in the "tank". Just by knowing the comp; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-12/msg00244.html (9,001 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] ICE 419A Combination Bandpass Filter 10M Section Blown (score: 1): Author: Jeff Goldman <k3dua@erols.com>; Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 18:11:47 -0500; I agree on the current problem view point on the filter failure. I had an ICE 6 meter filter that was rated at 250 watts, and it went out several times with the stock caps. I finally replaced the ori; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-12/msg00246.html (10,909 bytes)
6. RE: [TowerTalk] ICE 419A Combination Bandpass Filter 10M Section Blown (score: 1): Author: "Tony Kazmakites" <tony.kazmakites@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 17:01:21 -0500; I had a set of ICE bandpass filters that never saw more than 100w - used them on my Icom 751A to drive an amp. After I had used them for a few years I checked for insertion loss and passband. Some ha; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-12/msg00256.html (12,928 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] ICE 419A Combination Bandpass Filter 10M Section Blown (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 12:23:07 -0500; than 100w - used them for a few years changed. When I opened were blackened and W3NQN filters. It makes sense that if two samples fail in a few hours at 200 watts, they will be very marginal at 100; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-12/msg00257.html (9,155 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]