Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+IDEAS\s+\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+IDEAS\s+\?\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] IDEAS ?? (score: 1): Author: w5robert@blkbox.com (Robert W5AJ); Date: Sat, 21 Mar 1998 11:31:03 -0600; Here's your chance to give some free advice! HI! Up is a Wilson 77' crankup. A HDX48 is on the ground ready to go up. I have available for antenna: 204BA two of them 15-5 cushcraft 105BA two of them; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-03/msg00381.html (7,233 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] IDEAS ?? (score: 1): Author: Dick Green" <dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green); Date: Sat, 21 Mar 1998 13:06:23 -0500; I believe the Wilson ST-77B was the predecessor to the U.S. Tower MARB-770 tubular crankup, which I installed with a TH7 last summer. In the process of installing my MARB-770, I was lucky enough to o; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-03/msg00382.html (10,943 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] IDEAS ?? (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC); Date: Sat, 21 Mar 1998 13:31:13 EST; the If you're interested in more in-depth discussions on crank-up tower height, wind speed and tower load, you may be interested in the following articles. First is Roger Cox, WB0DGF's article called; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-03/msg00383.html (8,092 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] IDEAS ?? (score: 1): Author: w5robert@blkbox.com (Robert W5AJ); Date: Sun, 22 Mar 1998 22:05:56 -0600; I sense I asked the wrong question. for now address the band/tower issue Which bands would you place on each tower to give best performance?? i.e.: put a 20 stack on Wilson with the 40-2 on top & put; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-03/msg00413.html (7,661 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]