Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Impedance\s+at\s+the\s+Feedpoint\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Impedance at the Feedpoint (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Gillenwater" <gillie@pa.net>
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 16:21:04 -0400
If you have a feedpoint impedance of 32 ohms on an inverted "L" for 1.8 mhz, can anyone venture a guess as to what the impedance would be of the same antenna at 3.5 mhz ?? thanks, Bill ______________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00062.html (7,279 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Impedance at the Feedpoint (score: 1)
Author: TexasRF@aol.com
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 16:35:47 EDT
Several hundred ohms most likely. Many factors come into play, such as radiator diameter and objects within it's field that are coupling into the antenna. 73, Gerald K5GW In a message dated 11/6/2010
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00063.html (7,588 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Impedance at the Feedpoint (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 20:45:59 +0000
An EZNEC model of an Inverted-L with 60ft vertical and 77ft horizontal gave me a resonant feedpoint resistance of 32 Ohms at 1.8MHz when the ground loss resistance was 13 Ohms. That same antenna at 3
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00064.html (7,935 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Impedance at the Feedpoint (score: 1)
Author: Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net>
Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 15:47:21 -0700
It is going to have a pretty high impedance, just how high is hard to predict but the 50ohm swr is likely higher than 10. So an "open wire feeder" and a matching section is called for. For something
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00065.html (9,945 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Impedance at the Feedpoint (score: 1)
Author: "Al Williams" <alwilliams@olywa.net>
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 15:51:09 -0700
how did you determine the ground loss resistance of 13 ohms at 1.8 mhz & what would be the ground loss resistance at 3.5 mhz? k7puc _______________________________________________ ___________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00066.html (9,681 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Impedance at the Feedpoint (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 22:53:40 +0000
How is any of this relevant the question about his Inverted-L ? Steve G3TXQ _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list Towe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00067.html (8,034 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Impedance at the Feedpoint (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 22:57:49 +0000
I needed 13 Ohms ground loss to get to his measured resistance of 32 Ohms. But it doesn't matter whether that is right or wrong, nor what the value is on 80m, because compared to the Resistive compon
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00068.html (8,361 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Impedance at the Feedpoint (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 19:09:26 -0400
Why use an open wire feeder? You can tune the antenna at the base and run coax. You can even have a relay to bypass the tuning section when using it on 160m. Another option would be a relay or trap o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00069.html (8,786 bytes)

9. [TowerTalk] Impedance at the Feedpoint (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Gillenwater" <k3sv@pa.net>
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 12:53:20 -0400
If you have a feedpoint impedance of 32 ohms on an inverted "L" for 1.8 mhz, can anyone venture a guess as to what the impedance would be of the same antenna at 3.5 mhz ?? thanks, Bill ______________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00071.html (7,817 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Impedance at the Feedpoint (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 10:15:02 -0800
VERY high -- if it's 32 ohms on 160M, it's close to a quarter wave, which would make it close to a half wave long wire on 80M. WAG about 10K ohms. A good compromise is to make it a bit shorter (or lo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00097.html (9,133 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu